期刊文献+

同意的困境——基于以同意理论证成政府家长式干预的视角

The Predicament of Consent:on the View of Justify the Paternalistic Government Intervention by Consent Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在自由主义语境中,对政府家长式干预行为可行性的分析诉诸于对个人意愿真实性的探求,而同意理论作为个人意愿的有效表达方式成为家长主义和反家长主义者论辩的重点。但是,由于同意本身所具有的局限性,使得通过诉诸于个人意愿的方式证成政府家长式干预行为的路径遭遇了不可避免的困境。 In liberalism context,the analysis on the feasibility which is about paternalistic interference behavior of the government resorts to the genuineness of individual will,and as the most significant express approach of individual will,consent theory has become the key point in the dabate of paternalistics and anti-paternalistics.However,because of the limitations of consent,there has been some inevitable plight during justifying the paternalistic behavior of the government by the individual will.
作者 刘笑言
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2010年第5期7-11,共5页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词 自由主义 家长主义 干预 个人同意 liberalism paternalism interference individual consent
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1David J Garren. Paternalism : part II [ J ]. Philosophy Books,2007, 48(1).
  • 2Joel Feinberg. Legal paternalism [ M ]//Roll Sartorius. Paternalism 3. Minneaplois: University of Minneaplois Press, 1983:7.
  • 3Kleinig John. The ethics of consent [ J]. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1982,8 (S) :91.
  • 4John D Walker. Liberalism, consent, and the problem of adaptive preferences[ J ]. Social Theory & Practice, 1995,21 (3) :457 - 471.
  • 5John Feinberg. Harm to self[ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1956 : 12.
  • 6David J. Garren paternalism: part I[J]. Philosophy Books, 2006, 47(4) :334 -341.
  • 7Carole Pateman. Women and consent[ J ]. Political Theory, 1980,8 (2).
  • 8卡罗尔·帕特曼著 李朝晖译.性契约[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004..
  • 9Jon Elster. Sour grapes [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983:117.
  • 10史蒂文·卢克斯.权力[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2008:142.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部