期刊文献+

基于传统生态足迹法与能值生态足迹法的岳阳市可持续发展 被引量:2

Sustainable Development of Yueyang City Based on Methods of Conventional Ecological Footprint and Energy Ecological Footprint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为全面了解岳阳市的生态环境状况和可持续发展能力,运用传统生态足迹法和能值生态足迹法对岳阳市2007年的可持续发展状况进行比较分析,结果表明:按能值生态足迹法计算,2007年岳阳市人均生态足迹为10.03753 hm2,人均生态承载力为1.49204 hm2,人均生态赤字8.54549 hm2;按传统生态足迹法计算,2007年岳阳人均生态足迹为3.838203 hm2,人均生态承载力为0.469098 hm2,人均生态赤字3.369105 hm2。两种方法计算的生态足迹都超过了生态承载力,表明岳阳市社会经济发展处于不可持续状况。 The sustainable development status of Yueyang city was calculated by conventional ecological footprint and energy ecological footprint methods to overall understand the ecological environmental situation and sustainable development ability of Yueyang city.The results showed that the per capita ecological footprint,per capita biological bearing capacity and per capita ecological deficit calculated by the conventional ecological footprint method and energy ecological footprint method were 10.03753hm^2,1.49204hm^2 and 8.54549hm^2,and 3.838203hm^2,0.469098hm^2 and 3.369105hm^2 respectively in 2007.The ecological footprint calculated by two methods exceeds the biological bearing capacity,which indicates that the social and economic development is in an unsustainable status.
出处 《贵州农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第11期251-255,共5页 Guizhou Agricultural Sciences
基金 长沙市社科研究重点项目"3+5城市群旅游资源开发战略研究"(2010006)
关键词 传统生态足迹 能值生态足迹 生态承载力 可持续发展 岳阳市 conventional ecological footprint energy ecological footprint biological capacity sustainable development Yueyang city
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1HardiP, BargS, HodgeT, etal.. MeasuringSustainableDevelopment : Review of Current Practice,occasional paper number 17[C]. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 1997 : 49-45.
  • 2Cobb C, Halstead T, Rowe J. The Genuine Progress Indicator. Summary of data and methodology[M]. San FrancisCo, galifornia : Redefining Progress, 1995.
  • 3Daly,H. E. and J. B. Cobb Jr. For the common good. Redirecting the economy toward coummunity,the en viornment,and a sustainable future[M]. Boston, MA: Beacon Press,1994.
  • 4Ree W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environment and unbannization, 1992,4(2): 121-130.
  • 5William E Rees. Revisting carring capacity: area based indicators of sustainability[J]. Population and Enviornmental: a Journal of International Interdisciplinary Studies,1997,17(3) :1-22.
  • 6Odum. H. T. Environmental Accounting : Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York: John wiley, 1996 : 1-5.
  • 7张芳怡,濮励杰,张健.基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及应用——以江苏省为例[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(4):653-660. 被引量:157
  • 8刘淼,胡远满,常禹,张文广,张薇.基于能值理论的生态足迹方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(3):447-457. 被引量:71
  • 9张伟,康文星.基于能值理论的衡东县生态足迹研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2008,28(2):57-62. 被引量:10
  • 10Mathis Wakemagel, William Ree. Our Ecological footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island: New Society Publisher, 1996: 30-100.

二级参考文献120

共引文献310

同被引文献10

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部