期刊文献+

董事会规模对企业R&D投资行为的门槛效应分析——基于制造业和信息业面板数据的经验证据 被引量:12

The Threshold Effect Analysis of Board Size on Corporate R&D Investment Behavior——Base on Panel Data of Manufacturing and High-tech Industry Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2004-2008年连续披露R&D支出的制造业和高新技术业上市公司的样本数据,采用Hansen提出的门槛效应模型,实证检验董事会规模与企业R&D投资行为之间的关系。当以公司规模为门槛变量时研究发现,只有当公司规模超过某一临界值之后,董事会规模才与企业R&D行为之间表现为一种"先增后减"的非线性关系,并由此得出董事会规模的公司治理效应可能存在类似于宏观经济学中的"低水平陷阱"现象;而以董事会规模为门槛变量时发现,最佳的董事会规模应为7人或者9人。研究还发现,董事会中独立董事所占比例的增加对改善企业的R&D投资决策未起到明显效果,独立董事"花瓶"现象仍普遍存在。 Base on panel data of manufacturing and high-tech industry companies who discourse R&D expenditure in financial statements from 2004 to 2008, this paper studies the relationship between board sizes and R&D expending behavior by using the threshold model that Hansen proposed in 1999. When the threshold variable is company size, the results show that only when the company sizes exceeds a critical value, there will be a "increasing first, decreasing later" non-linear relationship between board sizes and corporate R&D expenditure. So we deduce that corporate governance effects of board sizes present the "low level trap" phenomenon. When the threshold variable is board sizes, the study suggests that the best board size should be 7 or 9. The results also show that percentage of independent directors on the Board play no effects to improve corporate R&D investment decisions.
作者 刘胜强 刘星
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期32-37,共6页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772100) 教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目09XJC630015)
关键词 董事会规模 企业R&D投资 门槛效应 board sizes corporate R&D expenditure threshold effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93: 345-368.
  • 2Zahra S A, Pearce II J A. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance, a review and integrated model [J]. Journal of Management, 1989, 2: 291-334.
  • 3Bacon J. Corporate directorship practice: member and committees of the board[ M ]. New York : The Conference Board, 1973.
  • 4Xie B, Davidson III W N, DaDatt P J. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee [ J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2003, 9: 295-316.
  • 5Ocasio W. Political dynamics and circulation of power: CEO succession in U. S. industrial corporations, 1960- 1990[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 31: 586-611.
  • 6Jensen M C. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 48 : 831-880.
  • 7Lipton M, Lorsch J A. Modest proposal for improved corporate governance[ J]. Business Lawyer, 1992, 48 ( 1 ) : 59 -77.
  • 8Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3 (4) : 305-360.
  • 9于东智,池国华.董事会规模、稳定性与公司绩效:理论与经验分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(4):70-79. 被引量:267
  • 10余怒涛,沈中华,黄登仕,刘孟晖.董事会规模与公司价值关系的进一步检验--基于公司规模门槛效应的分析[J].中国会计评论,2008,6(3):237-254. 被引量:17

二级参考文献75

共引文献1177

同被引文献190

引证文献12

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部