期刊文献+

不确定条件下的质量绩效测评方法 被引量:7

Approach of quality performance measurement and assessment under uncertainty
原文传递
导出
摘要 以ISO9004标准为基础,建立了质量绩效评价模型.根据评价模型的多层次多指标结构特征以及评价信息的不确定性特点,将D-S证据合成理论应用于质量绩效评价系统,利用模糊评判和群组决策方法处理评价过程中的不确定信息和未知信息,给出了D-S证据合成中mass函数的确定方法,并将一种改进的D-S证据合成方法应用于多专家、多指标的信息合成,从而建立了不确定条件下的质量绩效测量和评价方法.最后,通过实例应用对上述方法的实用性和有效性进行了说明. A quality performance(QP) assessment model and indicators based on ISO9004 standard are set up.Aimed at the characteristics of multi-levels,multi-indicators and the uncertainty of information in QP assessment,the evidential reasoning(ER) approach based on D-S theory is applied to QP assessment, the uncertain or unknown information in QP assessment are dealt with by using of the methods of fuzzy comprehensive judgment and group decision technique,and the computing methods of mass function are presented.A revised ER approach based on D-S theory in multiple-attribute decision-making under uncertainty is applied to the synthesizing of multi-experts and multi-indicators.Then a valid technique is established for the measurement and assessment of QP under uncertainty.Finally,a case is discussed to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期2013-2018,共6页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 河南省自然科学基金(082300460110) 河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划([2008]551号)
关键词 质量绩效 ISO9004标准 D-S理论 模糊评价 quality performance(QP) ISO9004 standard D-S theory fuzzy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1林作铨,牟克典,韩庆.基于未知扰动的冲突证据合成方法[J].软件学报,2004,15(8):1150-1156. 被引量:27
  • 2邢清华,雷英杰,刘付显.一种按比例分配冲突度的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2004,19(12):1387-1390. 被引量:42
  • 3卞显红.企业成功实施TQM的影响因素分析[J].商业研究,2007(1):4-8. 被引量:4
  • 4Smets P,Kennes R.The Transferable Belief Model[J].Artificial Intelligence,1994,66(2):191-234.
  • 5Li M,Yang J B.A Decision Model for Selfassessment of Business Process Based on the EFQM Excellence Model[J].Int J of Quality and Reliability Management,2003,20 (2):164-188.
  • 6Huynh V N,Nakamori Y.A Satisfactory-oriented Approach to Multi-expert Decision-making under Linguistic Assessments[J].IEEE Trans on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics-Part B:Cybernetics,2005,35(2):184-196.
  • 7Yang J B,Xu D L.On the Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis under Uncertainty[J].IEEE Trans on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics-Part A:Systems and Humans,2002,32 (3):289-304.
  • 8Van Nam Huynh,Yoshiteru Nakamori,Tu Bao Ho,et al.Assessment Aggregation in the Evidential Reasoning Approach to MADM Under Uncertainty:Orthogonal Versus Weighted Sum[A].Advances in Computer Science-ASIAN 2004:Higher-level Decision Making[C].Thailand,2004:109-127
  • 9Yager R R.On the Dempster-shafer Framework and New Combination Rules[J].Information System,1989,41(2):93-137.
  • 10Sime Curkovic, Shawnee Vickery, Cornelia Droge. Quality- related action programs: Their impact on quality performance and firm performance [ J ]. Decision Science, 2000,31 ( 4 ) : 885 - 905.

共引文献46

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部