期刊文献+

协合民主下的欧盟治理

EU Governance under Consociational Democracy
原文传递
导出
摘要 在当前欧盟的治理结构中,领导权在所有成员国之间按比例分配、各成员国保持着较高的自主性、所有成员国都拥有否决权,这些特点表明欧盟采取的是一种协合民主式的治理。这种协合民主对于欧盟有较好的治理效果,主要体现为维护了欧盟这一超国家权威的稳定。 Under the current EU governance,the power of leadership is distributed in proportion.All the member countries maintain substantial autonomy and are entitled the right to veto.This phenomenon points to evidence of consociational democratic governance,which is efficient and effective with satisfactory results.The main advantage of this mode is that it has kept the stability of supranational authority in EU.
作者 程同顺 高飞
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期49-54,共6页 Teaching and Research
关键词 协合民主 欧盟 治理 否决权 consociational democracy EU governance veto
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Robert Dahl. Democracy and Its Critics[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
  • 2Cees van der Eijk , Mark Franklin. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.
  • 3Wolfgang Streeck , Philippe Schmitter. Organized Interested and the Europe of 1992[A]. in N. Orestein , M. Perlman, (eds.). Political Power and Social Change: The United States Faces a United Europe[C]. Washington: AEI Press, 1991.
  • 4Sonia Mazy, Jeremy Richardsoru Conclusion: A European Policy Style? [A]. in Sonia Mazy, Jeremy Richardson, (eds.). Lobbying in the European Community[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • 5Jan Zielonka. Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union[J]. Journal of Cornn mon Market Studies, Vol. 45, No. 1, March 2007.
  • 6B. Wessels. The EC Council: The Community's Decisionmaking Center[J]. in R. O. Keohane , S. Hoffmanm (eds.). The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change [C]. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1991.
  • 7Simon Hix. The Political System of the European Union[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • 8Matthew J. Gabel. The Endurance of Supranational Governance: A Consociational Interpretation of the European Union [J]. Comparative Politics, Vol. 30, No. 4,July 1998.
  • 9Geoffrey Garrett , George Tsebelis. An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism[J]. International Organization, 1996, (50).
  • 10Arend Lijphart. The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation[J]. American Po litical Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, June 1996.

二级参考文献20

  • 1庄慧君.黎巴嫩的教派斗争[J].西亚非洲,1981(6):11-13. 被引量:2
  • 2屠振宇.当选制度的比较研究[J].人大研究,2005(10):42-44. 被引量:2
  • 3彭江.世界选举制度的主要模式及比较[J].人大研究,2006(7):40-42. 被引量:1
  • 4Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper, 1947.
  • 5劳伦斯·迈耶等.《比较政治学:变化世界中的国家和理论》,罗飞等译,华夏出版社,2001年,第47页.
  • 6阿伦·利普哈特.《民主的模式:36个国家的政府形式和政府绩效》,陈崎译,北京大学出版社,2006年,第23页.
  • 7Arend Lijhart, Non-Majoritarian Democracy: A Comparison of Federal and Consociational Theories, Publius, (Spring, 1985), pp. 3- 15.
  • 8沃尔特·白芝浩.《英国宪法》,夏彦才译,商务印书馆,2005年,第62页.
  • 9Lord Hailsham, The Dilemma of Democracy: Diagnosis and Prescription, London: Collins, 1978, p.127.
  • 10David Butler, Goveming Without a Majority, Macmillan Press, 1983, p.23.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部