期刊文献+

资本体现式和中性技术进步路径选择:基于我国制造业面板数据的实证检验 被引量:2

The Path of Capital Embodied and Neutral Technical Change:An Empirical Study on China's Manufacture Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者利用面板数据的回归方法分析我国制造业技术进步特征,结果显示资本体现式和中性技术进步都是制造业整体技术进步的重要来源,但资本体现式技术进步作用更稳健,产权制度和资本深化对制造业技术进步也起到正向的促进作用。按照技术属性对制造业分组采用PCSE回归方法检验,结果发现我国制造业低技术行业技术进步增长主要源于中性技术进步,而中高技术行业却取决于资本体现式技术进步和中性技术进步的共同作用。在回归方程的控制性变量中,利润率对低技术行业技术进步正向作用显著,对中高技术行业作用不明显。资产规模反向效应明显即行业资产规模越大越不利于技术进步,同时产权制度和资本深化在各组中显著正向作用保持不变,表明非国有经济发展和资本深化有利于行业技术进步。 The paper uses the panel data to analyze the characters of the manufacture industry of China,and it points out that capital embodied and neutral technical change are the important factors of technical change of manufacture industry,but technical change of industry is mainly form capital embodied technical change function.Property right institution and the level of capital deepening are to promote technical change.According to the grouping by technical change,the test of PSCE shows that technical change growth of the low technical change industry comes from neutral change,the middle and high technical change industry is from capital embodied technical change.With the controlling variables on the regression equation,the profit rate is positive to the low technical change industry,and is not noble.The scale of asset is passive to the whole industry,namely the bigger the scale of asset the more disadvantageous technical change of the industry.It also points that the property right institution and the deepening of capital are beneficial to technical change of manufacture industry.
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期49-54,共6页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(08CJY013) 国家社科基金青年项目(10CJL011) 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(09YJC790117) 吉林省社科基金项目(2009B014) 东北师范大学哲学社会科学青年科研团队项目(NENU-SKD2009)
关键词 资本体现式技术进步 技术进步路径 技术进步率 capital embodied technical change path of technical change rate of technical change
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Jorgenson Dale W. & J. Stiroh Kevin. U. S. Economic Growth at the Industry Level[J]. The American Economic Review,90(2), 2000: 161-167.
  • 2Oliner Stephen D. and Daniel E. Sichel. The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is information technology the story? [J]. Finance and Economics Discussion Series of the Federal Reserve System, 2000: 2-15.
  • 3Cummins,J. G, L. G. Violante. Investment-specific technical change in the US (1947-2000) : Measurement and Macroeconomics Consequenees[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5 (2), 2002 : 243- 284.
  • 4Gordon,R. J. Does the 'New Economy 'Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past? [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4) ,2000: 49-74.
  • 5Gordon, R. J. Technology and Economic Performance in the American Economy[J]. NBER working paper, w. 8771,2002 : 1 - 27.
  • 6Hulten, C. R. Growth Accounting When Technical Change is Embodied in Capital[J]. American Economic Review, 82 (4), 1992: 964-980.
  • 7Greenwood, J. and A. Seshadri. The U. S. Demographic Transition[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, working paper w. 0118,2001: 1-21.
  • 8Sakellaris,P. and D. Wilson. The Production-- Side Approach to Estimating Embodied Technological Change[J]. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, working paper, 2001 : 1 - 27.
  • 9林毅夫,任若恩.东亚经济增长模式相关争论的再探讨[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):4-12. 被引量:279
  • 10Yasar,M. and C. J. M. Paul. Capital--Skill Complementarity, Productivity and Wages: Evidence from Plant--Level Data for a Developing Country[J]. Labour Economies, 15,2008 : 1 - 17.

二级参考文献86

共引文献408

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部