期刊文献+

神经电生理及影像学检查在分娩性臂丛神经损伤诊断中的应用 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 分娩性臂丛神经损伤(OBPP)诊断目前仍存在许多争议,焦点在于如何准确评估患儿臂丛神经损伤性质、程度与范围。神经电生理及影像学检查是临床可借助的两种主要辅助诊断手段。神经电生理检查在评估病情严重程度上往往出现过于乐观的假象,但在术中判断神经根损伤性质时仍是最可靠手段。影像学检查中X线平片主要用于评估患儿膈肌功能;B超对臂丛神经检查主要用于束及以远水平,臂丛神经根干部复杂的局部解剖结构及B超自身对骨性结构显影的欠缺,均限制了其在臂丛神经近端的应用;CT脊髓造影仍是当前显示OBPP臂丛神经根的最佳手段,但判断脊神经根有无撕脱的敏感度尚不令人满意;MRI是目前研究的新方向,三维稳态构成干扰(3D-CISS)、三维短时反转恢复(3D-STIR)等新序列的开发,使得臂丛神经根显像质量进一步提高。该文就神经电生理检查及影像学检查在OBPP中的应用及其进展作一综述。
作者 李清 陈亮
出处 《国际骨科学杂志》 2010年第6期364-367,共4页 International Journal of Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1顾玉东.臂丛神经损伤损伤与疾病的诊治[M].第2版,上海:复旦大学出版社,2000:5.
  • 2Hale HB,Bae DS,Waters PM.Current concepts in the management of brachial plexus birth palsy.J Hand Surg Am,2010; 35(2):322-331.
  • 3Foad SL,Mehlman CT,Ying J.The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008; 90(6):1258-1264.
  • 4Evans-Jones G,Kay SP,Weindling AM,et al.Congenital brachial palsy:incidence,causes,and outcome in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal,2003; 88(3):F185-F189.
  • 5Jobe MT,Martinez SF.Peripheral nerve injuries[A].In:Campbell WC,Canale ST,Beaty JM eds.Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics[M].11th ed,New York:Mosby Elsevier,2007:3639-3641.
  • 6卢能祖,曾庆杏,李曾宴,等.实用肌电图学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.194-206,420-427.
  • 7木村淳主编(郭铁成,朱愈,译).神经肌肉疾病电诊断学原理与实践[M].第3版,天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2008:61.
  • 8Al-Qattan MM,El-sayed AA,Al-Kharfy TM,et al.Obstetrical brachial plexus injury in newborn babies delivered by caesarean section.J Hand Surg Br,1996; 21(2):263-265.
  • 9Mancias P,Slopis JM,Yeakley JW,et al.Combined brachial plexus injury and root avulsion after complicated delivery.Muscle Nerve,1994; 17(10):1237-1238.
  • 10Paradiso G,Granana N,Maza E.Prenatal brachial plexus paralysis.Neurology,1997; 49(1):261-262.

共引文献4

同被引文献38

  • 1高立,梁碧玲,张赟,钟镜联,叶瑞心.背景信号抑制弥散加权成像在臂丛神经的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(11):1756-1758. 被引量:10
  • 2高仕长,孟炜,陈亮,顾玉东.分娩性臂丛神经损伤危险因素的病例对照研究[J].中华手外科杂志,2012, 12 (10): 79-80.
  • 3Martinoli C. Brachial plexus and nerves about the shoul- der. Semin Museuloskelet Radiol, 2010, 14 (5) : 523-546.
  • 4Naoto Hayashi M. Accuracy of abnormal paraspinal mus- cle fingdings on contrast-enhanced MR images as indirect signs of unilateral cervical root-avulsion injury. Radiolo- gy, 2002,22 (3) : 397-420.
  • 5Anwar F, McLaughlin D, Panesar BS, Bilateral brachial plexus injury. J Coil Physicians Surg Pak, 2012,22(3): 176-178.
  • 6Tagliafico A. Brachial plexus assessment with three-di- mensional isotropic resolution fast spin echo MRI: com- parison with conventional MRI at 3.0 T. Br J Radiol, 2012,85 (1014) : 110-116.
  • 7Mallouhi A. 3T MR tomography of the brachial plexus: structural and microstructural evaluation. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81 ( 9 ) : 2231-2245.
  • 8Tagliafico A. MR imaging of the brachial plexus: com- parison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience. Skeletal Radiol, 2011,40(6) : 717-724.
  • 9Tagliafico A. Braehial plexus MR imaging: accuracy and reproducibility of DTI-derived measurements and fibre tractography at 3.0-T. Eur Radiol, 2011,21 (8) : 1764- 1771.
  • 10Guggenberger R. MR neurography of the median nerve at 3.0T: optimization of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81 (7) : 775-782.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部