期刊文献+

大学英语教学中反义词缀语用属性的研究 被引量:1

Research on Pragmatic Features of Antonymous Affixes in College English Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从词汇语用学的角度,分析了反义词的构成标准、表现形式、反义词缀派生规则的语义制约,运用语言顺应理论,探讨了英语反义词缀(特别是un-)在构词过程中的语用制约,并就其构成规则的内在机理与突破做了统一的解释;并以实例说明反义关系在英语教学中的意义。 A lexical pragmatic perspective is cast over antonym and analyzes constitutive standard,expression form on it,and applies the theory of linguistic adaptation to explore pragmatic restriction of English antonymous affixes,especially un-,in the formation of vocabulary and also uniformly explains intrinsic motivation and breakthrough of constitutive rules,finally illustrates the meaning of amtonymy in English teaching.
作者 周双
出处 《青海民族大学学报(教育科学版)》 2010年第6期113-117,共5页 Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College
关键词 词汇语用学 反义词缀 英语教学 lexical pragmatics antonymous affixes English teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Blutner, R. & Solstad, T. Two case studies in lexical pragmatics [A]. Nemeth, E. & Bibok, K. Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning[ C ]. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2001 : 11 - 28.
  • 2Horn, L. Uncovering the UN -word: A study in lexical pragmatics [ J]. Sophia Linguistica 2002,49:1 -64.
  • 3Lascarides, A. and Copestake, A. Pragmatics and Word Meaning [ J ]. Journal of Linguistics 1998,34 : 387 - 414.
  • 4McCawley, J. Conversational implicature and the lexicon [ A ]. Cole, P., Syntax and Semantics 9 : Pragmatics [ C ]. New York : Academic Press, 1978:245 - 259.
  • 5Nemeth, E. & Bibok, K. Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning[ C ]. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science, 2001, 289 - 320.
  • 6Packard, J. Pragmatic effects in the Chinese lexicon [J]. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 2003, 383 -394.
  • 7陈新仁.国外词汇语用学研究述评[J].外语研究,2005,22(5):5-9. 被引量:68
  • 8俞霞君.对中立语境中英语反义词认知的若干思考[J].浙江树人大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,7(5):95-98. 被引量:1
  • 9陈新仁.英语反义词缀派生的语用制约[J].外语研究,2008,25(1):10-15. 被引量:19
  • 10叶政年.反义关系及其教学意义[J].淮南师范学院学报,2001,3(2):83-84. 被引量:2

二级参考文献63

  • 1林汝昌,李曼珏.语义的对比关系和对立关系[J].外语教学与研究,1987,19(2):15-21. 被引量:8
  • 2陈新仁.词汇阻遏现象的顺应性阐释[J].外语学刊,2007(1):80-86. 被引量:41
  • 3Horn, L. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmaticinference: Q-based and R-based implicatures [A].Schiffrin, D. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context[C]. Washington:Georgetown University Press,1984.11-42.
  • 4Atlas, J. & Levinson, S. It-clefts, informativeness and logical form[A]. Cole, P. Radical Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1981:1--61.
  • 5Blutner, R. Lexical pragmatics [J]. Journal of Semantics 1998a, 15:115 -- 162.
  • 6Blutner, R. Lexical underspecification andpragmatics [A]. Ludewig, P. & Geurts, J.Lexikalische Semantik aus kognitiver Sicht [C].Ttibingen, 1998b: 141-- 171 .
  • 7Blumer, R. Lexical semantics and pragmatics[A].Hamm, F. & Zimmermann, T. Semantik [C].Hamburg, 2002:27--58 .
  • 8Blumer, R. Pragmatics and the lexicon[A]. Horn,L.&Ward, G. Handbook of Pragmatics [C].Oxford, Blackwell, 2004 : 488-514.
  • 9Blutner, R. , Leβmφllmann, A. & van der Sandt,R. Conversational implieature and lexieal pragmaties[A]. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposiumon Conversational Implicature [C]. Standford,1996:1--9.
  • 10Blutner, R. & Solstad, T. Two case studies inlexical pragmatics[A]. Ngmeth, E. & Bibok, K.Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning[C]. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2001:11--28.

共引文献85

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部