期刊文献+

HAZOP分析中LOPA的应用研究 被引量:74

Study on Application of LOPA in HAZOP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析危险与可操作性研究(HAZOP)方法的不足和保护层分析(LOPA)方法的功能,提出将LOPA融入HAZOP分析中,能进一步提高HAZOP的事故预防能力和丰富HAZOP的分析结果。介绍LOPA基本方法,阐述LOPA融入HAZOP的机理、衔接关系及分析步骤,并通过一个化工工艺流程危险性分析实例说明LOPA的作用及如何将LOPA融入HAZOP分析中。结果表明:在HAZOP分析中融入LOPA方法,能实现对现有保护措施的可靠性进行量化评估,确定其消除或降低风险的能力,从而寻求是否需要附加减少风险的安全保护措施。 Based on the analysis of the deficiencies of Hazard and Operability study (HAZOP) and the function of Layer of Protection Analysis ( LOPA), it is presented that the integration of HAZOP with LOPA can greatly improve HAZOP's abihty to prevent accidents and enrich its analysis results. This article firstly introduces LOPA method, and elaborates the mechanism of integrating LOPA into HAZOP, their connec- tion relation and the analysis step of the integrated method. Then, an example of chemical process hazard analysis is given to illustrate LOPA's function played in HAZOP and how to integrate LOPA into HAZOP. The result indicates that the integrated method can make a quantitative assessment on the reliability of the existing to learn safeguards , determine their ability to eliminate or reduce risks, which is helpful for risk managers whether additional safeguards are needed to install into the system.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期76-81,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(51074072) 教育部高等学校特色专业建设点项目资助(TS11624)
关键词 危险与可操作性研究(HAZOP) 保护层分析(LOPA) 事故场景 独立保护层(IPL) 要求失效概率(PFD) 偏差 风险 安全保护措施 hazard and operability study (HAZOP) layer of protection analysis (LOPA)haT^rd scenario independent protection layer(IPL) probability of failure on demand(PFD) deviation risk safeguards
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1姜春明,赵文芳,姜巍巍,卢卫.HAZOP技术的研究与应用[J].现代化工,2004,24(z2):137-139. 被引量:13
  • 2罗云.我国安全生产现状分析[J].中国发展观察,2005(5):33-37. 被引量:26
  • 3Vaidhyanathan R, V. A semi-quantitative reasoning methodology for filtering and ranking HA ZOP results in HAZOP Expert. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 53(2):185-203.
  • 4Vaidhyanathan R, Venkatasubramanian V. HAZOPEpert: An expert system for automating HAZOP analysis. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(2):80-88.
  • 5The American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Dow Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide(7th e,d). New York: The American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994.
  • 6Scheffler N E. inheretly safer latex plants. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(1):11-17.
  • 7Gowland R. Applying inherently safer concepts to a phosgene plant acqusition. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(1):52-57.
  • 8Etowa C B, Amyotte P R and Pegg M J, et al. Quantification of inherent safety aspects of the Dow indices. Journal of Loss Prevention, 2002, 15(6):477-487.
  • 9Faisal I K, Sadiq R and Paul R A. Evaluation of available indices for inherently safer design options. Process Safety Progress.2003, 22:83-97.
  • 10Suardina J. The integration of Dow's fire and explosion index (F&EI) into process design and optimization to achieve inherently safer design. Journal of Loss Prevention, 2007, 20(1):79-90.

共引文献133

同被引文献387

引证文献74

二级引证文献278

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部