期刊文献+

会计政策组合选择与成本费用相关性研究——基于2008年沪深股市的检验

Relence of Accounting Policy Choice and Costs or Expenses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2008年沪深股市发行A股的公司为样本,对我国上市公司会计政策组合选择与成本费用的相关性进行了检验。结果发现:会计政策选择与管理费用、公允价值变动损益具有很强的相关性,但与营业成本的相关性不显著。会计政策选择中摊提费用的处理方法极大的影响了管理费用的高低;公允价值变动损益(绝对值)的高低取决于企业的会计政策是否较多地采用了公允价值计量,表现为是否较多地确认了交易性金融资产、投资性房地产后续计量模式是否较多地选择了公允价值计量。此外,偿债能力弱的公司和高盈利公司会通过尽量多的发生管理费来向下操纵盈余,大亏公司也将公允价值变动损益当作大清洗的手段。无一例外的营业成本、管理费用和公允价值变动损益都受资产规模的影响。 This paper discuss the accounting policy choice based 1592 listed companies in 2008.We provided relence of accounting policy choice and administration expenses , accounting policy choice and profit and loss of change in fair value.Accounting policy about deferred expensesthe influenced administration expenses. The large- profit companes by administration expenses smothed income.The motivation of large- loss companes by profit and loss of change in fair value is take a big bath.
出处 《财会通讯(下)》 2010年第11期14-18,共5页 Communication of Finance and Accounting
基金 航空科学基金项目“航空企业会计政策选择与成本控制实证研究”(项目编号:2008ZG55012) 河南省社科规划项目“基于新会计管制的河南省上市公司会计变更寻租研究”(项目编号:2009BJJ018) 河南省科技厅软科学项目“新会计准则对会计政策选择影响研究”(项目编号:082400430730)阶段性成果
关键词 会计政策组合选择 管理费用 公允价值变动损益 相关性 Accounting policy choice Administration expenses Profit and loss of change in fair value Relence
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1韩东平,袁知柱.不对称信息条件下企业生产成本契约的设计[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,36(6):808-811. 被引量:4
  • 2梁杰,于健:《公司治理对会计选择的影响--基于深沪A股东北上市公司的实证研究》,《中国会计学会2004年学术年会论文集》,西安交通大学2004年.
  • 3威廉姆R.司可脱:《财务会计理论》,机械工业出版社2000年版.
  • 4Abdel-Khafik A. R. The effect of LIFO-switching and firm ownership on executives pay. Journal of Accounting Research, 1985.
  • 5Arcelus F. J. and Trenho|m, B. A. Identifying the firm's characteristics affecting the choice of inventory valuation methods. International Journal of Production Economics , 1991.
  • 6Archambault J. J. and Archambault M. E. Inventory accounting policy choice among Canadian firms. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 1994.
  • 7Caster P. and Simon D. T. The association between selected variables and invenlo- methods. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 1986.
  • 8Dopuch N. and Pincus M. Evidence on the choice of inventorT accounting methods: LIFO versus FIFO. Journal of Accounting Research,1988.
  • 9Frankel M. and Trczevant R. The year-end LIFO inventory purchasing decision: An empirical test. The Accounting Review , 1994.
  • 10Healy P. The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985.

二级参考文献9

  • 1ACKERBERG D A. , BOTTICINIT M. The choice of agrarian contracts in early renaissance tuscany:risk sharing,moral hazard, or capital market imperfections [J].Explorations in Economic History, 2000 ( 7 ) 241 - 257.
  • 2ZIMMERMAN J. The costs and benefits of cost allo cat ions [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1979 ( 7 ): 505 - 521.
  • 3MAGEE R. Variable cost allocation in a principle/agent settings [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1988 ( 1 ) :42 -54.
  • 4RAJAN M. Cost allocation in multiagent settings [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1992 (7) :527 - 545.
  • 5SCOTT W R. Financial Accounting Theory [ M ]. [ s. l. ]: Prentice-Hall International Inc, 1997.
  • 6PRESCOTT E S, ROBERT M. Townsend collective organizations versus relative performance contracts: inequality, risk sharing, and moral hazard [ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2002, :282 - 310.
  • 7BANK J S, SUNDARAM R K. Optimal retention in agency problems [ J ]. Journal of Economics Theory, 1998 (10) :293 -323.
  • 8韩东平,叶元煦.基于博奕论解析财务管理目标[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2001,33(4):475-478. 被引量:5
  • 9韩东平.基于代理理论的财务控制契约签订原则研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2003,35(7):862-865. 被引量:2

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部