人工流产术后即放置GyneFix IN致美宫内节育器120例临床观察

OBSERVATION ON CLINICAL EFFECTS OF GYNEFIX IN ZHIMEI INTRAUTERINE DEVICES INSERTING IMMEDIATELY AFTER ARTIFICIAL ABORTION IN 120 CASES

目的观察人工流产术后即时放置GyneFix IN致美宫内节育器的临床使用性能。方法随机给240例健康已婚育龄妇女在人工流产术后即时放置两种不同宫内节育器,其中GyneFix IN致美IUD 120例,对照组放置GyneFix IN IUD 120例,在放置后的3、6、12个月进行随访观察。结果使用12个月时两组IUD妊娠率均为1.67%(p>0.05);脱落率分别为0.87%,2.50%,GyneFix IN致美组明显低于GyneFix INIUD组(p<0.01);GyneFix IN致美组无1例因症取出,而GyneFix IN IUD组因症取出率为2.50%,GyneFix IN致美组明显低于GyneFix IN IUD组,两组差异有显著性意义(p<0.01)。结论 GyneFix IN致美较GyneFix INIUD具有出血少,因症取出率低,不良反应少,避孕效果好,是目前较理想的适合人流后放置的宫内节育器。

Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of GyneFix IN zhimei IUD inserting immediately after artificial abortion.Methods Two types of IUDs were randomly adopted in 240 healthy,fertile women.GyneFix IN zhimei IUD and GyneFix IN IUD accounted for 120 women,respectively.They were followed up by 3,6,12months later after the manipulations to analyze the outcome of the employment of two different types of IUDs with life-table statistics.Results 12 months after inserting,the incidence of pregnancy with GyneFix IN zhimei IUD and GyneFix IN IUD were both 1.67%,there was no significant difference between the two groups（p〉0.05）.The expulsion rate was 0.87%,2.50%,respectively.GyneFix IN zhimei group was obviously lower than the other group（p〈0.01）.The removal rate for related complication was 0%,2.5%,respectively.GyneFix IN zhimei group was obviously lower than GyneFix IN group,there was obviously significant difference between the two groups（p〈0.01）.Conclusion Compare to GyneFix IN IUD,GyneFix IN zhimei IUD has fewer hemorrhage,fewer removal rate for related complication and fewer side effects.It is suitable for a wider range of women＇s health needs after artificial abortion.