期刊文献+

APRI与肝硬化食管静脉曲张相关性研究 被引量:13

Study on the clinical correlations between the ratio index APRI and esophageal varices degree of cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨APRI数值与肝硬化静脉曲张的相关性。方法对54例肝硬化伴有食管静脉曲张患者静脉曲张程度进行分级,同时检测AST和PLT,计算AST与PLT比值指数(APRI)。比较不同程度食管静脉曲张分级与APRI间的相关性,并对肝硬化患者有/无食管静脉曲张的APRI进行对比研究。结果不同分级食管静脉曲张患者比较,PLT在G0与G2之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在G0与G3之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),在G1与G3之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);APRI在G0与G2、G0与G3之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对于AST、PLT、APRI,有/无食管静脉曲张患者之间进行比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01),其余均无统计学意义。结论 APRI可作为预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的诊断指标之一。 Objective To explore the clinical correlations between the ratio index APRI and Esophageal Varices degree of cirrhosis.Methods Fifty-four cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices were retrospectively studied. The esophageal varices grading were assessed. Independent-samples T test was used for comparisons of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels,blood platelet counts (PLT),APRI among different esophageal varices grading (G0 to G3). Results Comparison between various esophageal varices degree show that there were significant differences between G0 and G2 in PLT (P〈0.05),and also significant differences between G0 and G3 (P〈0.01). There was a significant difference between G1 and G3 (P〈0.01); There were significant diferences in AST,PLT and APRI between G0 and G2,G0 and G3 (P〈0.05),There were significant diferences in AST,PLT and APRI between esophageal varices patients and the others (P〈0.05,P〈0.01). Conclusion APRI could be one of the diagnose index for prediction Esophageal Varices.
作者 王俐琼 张玮
出处 《肝脏》 2010年第5期323-325,共3页 Chinese Hepatology
基金 上海市卫生局青年科研项目(2008W132)
关键词 肝硬化 食管静脉曲张 APRI cirrhosis Esophageal Varices APRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1慢性乙型肝炎防治指南[J].肝脏,2005,10(4):348-357. 被引量:272
  • 2Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, et al. Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet, 2001, 357: 1069-1075.
  • 3Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Llovet JM, et al. Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology, 2002, 36: 986-992.
  • 4Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology, 2003, 38: 518-526.
  • 5Adams I.A, Bulsara M, Rossi E, et al. Hepascore: an accurale validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Chcm, 2005, 51 : 1867-1873.
  • 6Zeng MD, Lu LG, Mao YM, et al. Prediction of significant fibrosis in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B by a noninvasive model. Hepatology, 2005, 42: 1437-1445.
  • 7Hui AY, Chan HL, Wong VW, et al. Identification of chronic hepatitis B patients without significant liver fibrosis by a simple noninvasive predictive model. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100: 616-623.
  • 8Bourliere M, Penaranda G, Renou C, et al. Validation and comparison of indexes for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients: proposal for a pragmatic approach classification without liver biopsies. J Viral Hepat, 2006, 137 659-670.
  • 9Leroy V, Hilleret MN, Sturm N, et al. Prospective comparison of six non-invasive scores for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatoi, 2007, 46: 775-782.
  • 10Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. J Hepatol, 1991, 13: 372-374.

共引文献22

同被引文献145

引证文献13

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部