期刊文献+

Acrysoft ReStOr多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用观察 被引量:1

Clinical application of phacoemulsitication after implantation of an apodized diffractive multffocal I- OL (Acrysoft ReSTOR)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨新型Acrysoft ReStOr多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用价值.方法 36例46只眼老年性白内障患者按自愿原则分为两组,多焦组19例(23只眼)单焦组17例(23只眼)均行标准白内障超声乳化吸除术,按分组分别植入ReStOrSA60D3衍射型多焦点人工晶状体和NaturalSN60AT单焦点人工晶状体,观察并记录术后不同时期术眼的裸眼远、近视力、最佳矫正远、近视力、最佳矫正远视力下近视力、拟调节力、对比敏感度及视觉质量等结果.结果 各期两组患者间裸眼远视力、最佳矫正远视力及最佳矫正近视力均差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05);多焦组裸眼近视力、最佳矫正远视力下近视力和拟调节力显著优于单焦组(P<0.05),多焦组近、中距离的视觉质量满意度也较单焦组有明显提高(P<0.05).结论 Acrysoft ReStOr多焦点人工晶状体可为白内障术后患者提供良好的远,中,近视力,提高生活质量值得临床推广应用. Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of a multifocal IOL (Acrysoft ReSTOR). Methods Thirty-six patients with age-related cataract (46 eyes) were divided into two groups: MIOL group included 19 patients (23 eyes), SIOL group included 17 patients (23 eyes). All patients underwent phacoemulsification. MIOL group implanted ReSTOR SA60D3 and SIOL group implanted NaturalSN60AT. At 1 week, 3 months postoperatively, distant and near visual acuities, pseudoaccomodation, contrast sensitivity and patients's satisfaction with their vision were assessed. Results Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), Best-corrected near visual (BCNV) in the multifocal were not statistically different from the sonofocal group (P ≥0.05), Uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), Best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), pseudoaccomodation and the satisfaction of intermediate and near vision were better statistically in the multifocal group compared to the monofocal group (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Acrysoft ReSTOR can provide excellent outcomes in distance, intermediate and near vision, so as to improve the quality of life after surgery.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期1236-1238,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 白内障 多焦点 人工晶状体 衍射 Cataract Multifocal Intraocular lens Diffraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1黄蒂,施玉英.Acrysof ReSTOR多焦点人工晶状体临床应用的初步报告[J].眼科,2006,15(5):344-347. 被引量:22
  • 2Chiam PJ,Chan J H,Aggarwal RK.KasahyS.ReSTOR inlraocularlens implantation in cataract surgery.: quality of vision. [J]Cataract Refract Surg,2006, 32 (9): 1459-1463.
  • 3Petermeier,K, Szurman .P.A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of muhifocal lenses [J] .Craefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010. 24(8): 125-127.
  • 4Ken Havashi Miki Masumoto, Hideyuki Hayashi .All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens [J]. Ophthahnology,2009.53, (2):164-168.
  • 5李霞,谭少健,梁皓,李伟均,苗重会.多焦点人工晶体眼视功能的研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2005,23(1):39-44. 被引量:34
  • 6Rocha KM, Chalita MR, Souza CE.et al.Postoperative wavefront analv sis and contrast sensitivity of a multifocal apodized diffractive IOL (ReSTOR)and three monofocal IOLs [J] .Refract Surg,2005,21 (6) 808-812.
  • 7T.Kohnen ,D.Kook,G.U.Auffarth anti V.Derhartunian Use of multifoeal intraocular lenses and eriteria for patient selection. .[J] Der Ophthalmologe, 2008,105,( 6): 124-127.

二级参考文献21

  • 1王海林,关家璓,凡长春,陶军.人工晶体位置及类型与伪调节的关系[J].中国实用眼科杂志,1995,13(5):284-286. 被引量:8
  • 2Lim JI, Kuppermann BD, Gwon A, et al. Vitrenretinal surgery through multifocal intraocular lenses compared with monofocal intraocular lenses in fluid - Pilled and air - filled rabbit eyes. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107 (6) : 1083 - 1088.
  • 3Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1987, 13 (5) : 557--560.
  • 4Pieh S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability with diffractive and refractivemultifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24 (5): 659--662.
  • 5Ravalico G. Parentin F, Sirotti P, et al. Analysis of light energy distribution by multifocal intraocular lenses throughan experimental optical model. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24 (5): 647 652.
  • 6Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost Dj, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal - progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106 (7): 1243--1255.
  • 7Dick HB, Krist R, Schwenn O, et al. Near vision after implantation of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses. Kiln Monatsbl Augenheilkd, 2001, 218 (6): 406--411.
  • 8Walkow L, Klemen UM. Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2001,239 (9): 683--687.
  • 9Walkow T. Liekfeld A. Anders N. et al. A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus a refractive designed multifocal intraocularlens. Ophthalmology. 1997, 104 (9): 1380--1386.
  • 10Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol, 2001, 36 (4): 197--201.

共引文献52

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部