摘要
目的 探讨小切口非超声乳化白内障及硅凝胶人工晶状体植入术的临床效果,对比国产硅凝胶人工晶状体和进口硅凝胶人工晶状体的疗效.方法 对98例(103只眼)施行小切口非超声乳化后分别植入国产艾克伦晶状体和进口Canon starr晶状体的患者进行随机分组,对术后1d、1周、1月、3月、6月视力、前房炎症及其他并发症进行观察记录.结果 术后最佳矫正视力≥1.0者24只眼(23.53%),(70.59%)的本眼最佳矫正视力≥0.5,无严重并发症发生.结论 小切口非超声乳化白内障术后植入国产艾克伦硅凝胶晶状体和进口Canon starr硅凝胶晶状体疗效接近.
Objective To investigate the clinical results of the non-phacoemulsification small incision cataract extraction and silicone intraocular lens implantation, compared to the effect of Chinese-made silicone intraocular lens and imported silicone intraocular lens. Methods Ninety-eight cases (103 eyes) were randomly divided into the small-incision after phacoemulsification and implanted intraocular lens of the domestical Exlen group and imported Cannon Starr group. Vision, anterior chamber inflammation and other complications were observed and recorded 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after surgery. Results The best corrected visual acuity ≥ 1.0 in 24 eyes (23.53%), best corrected visual acuity ≥0.5 (70.59%), no serious complications occurred.Conclusions The efficacy ofsmall incision phacoemulsification cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation between domestically produced Exlen and imported Cannon Starr silicone intraocular lens is similar.
出处
《中国实用眼科杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第11期1239-1240,共2页
Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词
白内障
小切口
晶状体
人工
硅凝胶
Cataract
Small incision
Intraocular lens
Artificial
Silicon