期刊文献+

基于Logistic曲线模型的颈椎病根性疼痛物理治疗效果预测分析 被引量:2

Prediction of the effectiveness of physical therapy in treating cervical radiculopathy patients with pain based on a Logistic curve model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:在对治疗过程完成数学表达的基础上,建立能够预测颈椎病根性疼痛物理治疗效果的预测模型。方法:对一组连续接受10次物理治疗的颈椎病根性疼痛患者在治疗过程中连续进行视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评定,采用前期建立的LOGISTIC曲线模型,分别以2—9次的测量值完成曲线拟合并预测全疗程的最终效果,将预测结果与实际测量结果进行比较探讨各预测模型的预测能力,确定合理的预测模型。结果:模型的预测能力随试验治疗次数的增加而增加,其中4次以下测量值完成的预测分析,其预测能力较低。当使用5次以上测量结果完成分析时,预测能力优于4次以下测量值的预测结果,预测效果满意。结论:采用LOGISTIC回归模型,以4次连续的试验性治疗所获得的5个测量数据能够有效地预测全疗程的治疗效果。 Objective: To establish a predictive model to describe the effectiveness of physical therapy on cervical radiculopathy patients' pain. Method: Multiple physical therapies were administered in 90 cervical radiculopathy patients with pain for 10 consecutive sessions. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the pain severity before each session. The first 2 to 9 pain measurements were involved in different predictive models. The predictive results from different models were compared. Result: The more measurements were involved in the predictive model, the more effective prediction will be. When the model only included less than 4 measurements, the ability of predictive model was poor. When more than 5 measurements were used with the model, the predictions were successful. Conclusion: The LOGISTIC model can predict the effectiveness of multiple physical therapies on cervical radiculopathy patients, by 4 consecutive sessions of treatment with 5 measurement results.
作者 李雪迎 王琳
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期1056-1060,共5页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 颈椎病 物理治疗 疼痛评定 LOGISTIC模型 预测 cervical radiculopathy physical therapy pain measurement LOGISTIC model prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

共引文献373

同被引文献23

  • 1王驰,岳翔,赵强.大力量间歇牵引与小力量持续牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006,28(6):418-419. 被引量:7
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部医政司.中国康复医学诊疗规范(下册)[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.290-292.
  • 3Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, et al. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trail. Phys Ther,2007 ,87 :431-442.
  • 4Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Kulig K, et al. Comparison, of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy tecbniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule. A randomized clinical trial. Spine ,2009,34:2720-2729.
  • 5Luk KD, Wan TW, Wong YW, et al. A multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain:a prospective stu- dy. J Orthop Sarg,2010,18:131-138.
  • 6Kelly AM. The minimum clinical difference in visual analogue scale pain scale does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J,2001, 18 : 205-207.
  • 7Hallegraeff JM, de Greef M, Winters JC, et al. Manipulative therapy and clinical prediction criteria in treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain. Percept Mot Skills ,2009,108 : 196-208.
  • 8Hancock M J, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy:a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J ,2008,17:936-943.
  • 9Lindell O, Johansson SE, Strender LE. Predictors of stable return-towork in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sicklisting,hlgh self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract,2010,11:53.
  • 10Smects R, Maher CG, Nicholas MK, et al. Do psychological characteris- tics predict response to exercise and advice for subacuLe low back pain. Arthritis Rheum ,2009,61 : 1202-1209.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部