罗尔斯《万民法》的研究现状：批评与辩护(下) 被引量：3

原文传递

导出

摘要四、罗尔斯《万民法》的辩护者许多哲学家都试图反驳这些长篇大论的批评，为罗尔斯的理论辩护，他们已尝试构筑多条防线。一种通常的观点认为批评者未能充分注意到《万民法》中一些方向性的突出问题。

作者吉里恩·布罗克(著) 陈珂(译)

机构地区不详中国人民银行

出处《国外理论动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期69-75,共7页 Foreign Theoretical Trends

关键词《万民法》罗尔斯批评者辩护现状哲学家方向性

参考文献42

1Heath,"Rawls on Global Distributive Justice," p.212.
2Freeman ,"Introduction " p. 46.
3Freeman ,"Introduction " p.46-47.
4Rawls ,Law of Peoples ,p. 10.
5Rawls ,Law of Peoples ,p. 5-6.
6Catherine Audard, " Cultural Imperialism and ' Democratic Peace,'" in Rawls's Law of Peoples, ed. by Martin and Reidy, pp. 59 -75 ,at p. 73.
7罗尔斯.《政治自由主义》(1993).
8Leif Wenar,"Why Rawls Is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian," in Rawls's Law of Peoples ,ed. Martin and Reidy ,pp. 95 - 113.
9Leif Wenar,"Why Rawls Is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian," in Rawls's Law of Peoples ,ed. Martin and Reidy ,pp. 100.
10Leif Wenar,"Why Rawls Is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian," in Rawls's Law of Peoples ,ed. Martin and Reidy ,pp. 110.

1刘贺青,王军.全球正义研究的兴起及争论[J].江淮论坛,2007(3):97-101. 被引量：5
2[美]罗伯特·诺奇克.无政府、国家和乌托邦[M].姚大志译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
3罗尔斯.正义论(修订版)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
4[美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论(修订版)[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
5[美]涛慕思·博格.康德、罗尔斯与全球正义[M].刘莘,徐向东,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2010.
6Samuel Freeman. Distributive Justice and The Law of Peoples [ C]. in Rawls Law of Peoples, ed. Martin and Reidy, Wiley- Blackwell, 2006.
7彼得·辛格.一个世界一全球化伦理[M].应奇,等,译.北京:东方出版社,2005.
8涛慕斯·博格.康德、罗尔斯与全球正义[M].徐向东,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2010.
9Charles Beitz. Justice and International Relations[ J ] . Philosophy & Pubhc Affairs, Vol.g, No.d(Summer,1975).
10Charles Beitz. Political Theory and Inter national Relations[ M ]. Princeton University Press, 1999.