摘要
目的观察铺棉灸疗法、火针疗法治疗带状疱疹的疗效,比较分析这两种针灸疗法之间的疗效差异。方法将60例带状疱疹患者随机分为铺棉灸组和火针组各30例,在围针刺和电针治疗的基础上两组分别施以铺棉灸治疗和火针治疗,连续治疗10天后,观察两组患者疱疹止疱、结痂、脱痂时间及疼痛缓解程度、疼痛持续时间、疼痛开始缓解时间,并进行综合疗效评价。结果铺棉灸组和火针组患者总有效率分别为93.3%和90.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者疼痛开始缓解时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),止疱、结痂、脱痂时间、疼痛缓解程度、疼痛持续时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论铺棉灸法、火针法治疗带状疱疹均有良好疗效,铺棉灸法在疼痛缓解方面优于火针法。
Objective To observe the effect of cotton-sheet moxibustion therapy and fire-needle therapy on herpes zoster,and to compare the therapeutic difference of the two methods.Methods Sixty patients were randomized into the cotton-sheet moxibustion group and fire-needle group with 30 in each. After surrounding acupuncture and electro-acupuncture,two groups were applied cotton-sheet moxibustion and fire-needle therapy respectively. The treatment lasted for 10 days in succession. The stopped development of blisters,scabbing and removing of scabs,degree of pain relief,time of pain lasting,beginning time of pain relief were observed and the effect was comprehensively evaluated.Results The total effective rate in the cotton-sheet moxibustion group and fire-needle group was 93.3% and 90.0% respectively,without significant difference(P〉0.05). There was a significant difference in the beginning time of pain relief between the two groups (P〈0.05),but there was no significant difference in the stopped development of blisters,scabbing and removing of scabs,degree of pain relief,and time of pain lasting between the two groups (P〉0.05).Conclusion Both cotton-sheet moxibustion and fire-needle therapy have good effect on herpes zoster. The former is superior to the latter in pain relief.
出处
《中医杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第11期1006-1008,共3页
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
“十一五”国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAI12B07)
关键词
带状疱疹
铺棉灸
火针
随机对照试验
Herpes zoster
Cotton-sheet moxibustion
Fire-needle therapy
Randomized controlled trial