期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死治疗指南对我国住院患者治疗及预后的影响 被引量:32

Impact of the acute myocardial infarction guidelines on in-hospital managements and outcome of the patients in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 分析美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)2004年修订的急性心肌梗死(AMI)治疗指南对我国住院患者早期再灌注治疗、药物治疗和预后的影响,以及目前我国执行指南中存在的差距.方法 应用回顾性研究方法,选择2002年1月至2006年12月在全国12家医院心内科明确诊断为AMI的患者共1 278例,依据指南公布时间,将入选患者分为指南公布前组(2002年1月至2004年8月,A组,734例)和指南公布后组(2004年8月至2006年12月,B组,544例).比较两组基线特征、住院治疗措施(早期再灌注和药物治疗)、并发症(再发心肌梗死、梗死后心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭、心源性休克和出血)及病死率情况;并分别对两组住院期间治疗措施与病死率进行相关性分析.结果 ①两组AMI患者年龄、性别、收缩压、除陈旧性心肌梗死外的既往史比较差异无统计学意义;B组心功能Killip≥Ⅲ级比例低于A组(7.5%比14.7%,P<0.01).②B组早期再灌注治疗总比例高于A组(78.5%比71.2%,P<0.05);其中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)比例较A组明显升高(71.5%比61.0%,P<0.01),而溶栓治疗比例较A组明显降低(8.6%比16.3%,P<0.01).⑧两组抗血小板药物总体使用率及其中阿司匹林使用率均大于97.0%,其中B组盐酸噻氯匹定使用率较A组明显下降(8.3%比54.9%),氯吡格雷和血小板膜糖蛋白Ⅲa/Ⅰ b(GP Ⅲ a/Ⅰ b)类药物使用率均较A组明显升高(83.8%比27.4%,4.8%比0.7%,均P<0.01);B组血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素Ⅰ受体拮抗剂(ARB)类药物总体使用率明显高于A组(98.2%比93.5%,P<0.01),其中ARB类药物使用率较A组明显升高(13.6%比4.4%,P<0.05),而ACEI类药物使用率较A组明显下降(84.6%比89.1%,P<0.01);B组肝素或低分子肝素、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物使用率均高于A组(97.4%比94.8%,80.1%比74.8%,87.7%比82.4%,P<0.05或P<0.01).④B组住院期间病死率及再发心肌梗死、梗死后心绞痛发生率均明显低于A组(4.6%比7.6%,2.8%比4.8%,8.4%比12.4%,均P<0.05).⑤多因素分析显示:A、B组早期再灌注、抗血小板药物及B组他汀类药物、肝素或低分子肝素与住院期间病死率有独立的显著联系(均P<0.05).结论 2004年指南公布后我国AMI患者早期再灌注率和药物治疗的规范化程度明显提高,住院期间病死率及再发心肌梗死和梗死后心绞痛发生率明显降低,且早期再灌注、抗血小板药物、他汀类药物、肝素或低分子肝素与住院期间病死率存在独立的显著联系,与指南要求一致;但目前我国在β受体阻滞剂、ACEI/ARB类药物治疗方面仍然存在着较大提升空间. Objective To investigate the relationship between the guidelines issued by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) in 2004 and the changes in early reperfusion, drug treatment and outcome of inpatients -with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in China, and to explore what extent the guidelines are followed in the management of AMI in China, and the differences in managements and patients' outcome after its issue.Methods A retrospective study of clinical data of 1 278 patients with AMI admitted to 12 Chinese Hospitals from January 2002 to December 2006 was carried out.They were divided into two groups: group A included 734 patients admitted from January 2002 to August 2004, and group B comprised 544 patients admitted from August 2004 to December 2006.The baseline characteristics, early reperfusion, drug treatment, reinfarction, angina pectoris, heart failure,cardiogenic shock, bleeding and death were compared between two groups.The correlation between therapeutic measure and mortality was analyzed to estimate the difference between two groups, and relationship between the differences and the guidelines issued in 2004 was also analyzed.Results ①The age, sex, systolic blood pressure, history of past illness excepting old myocardial infarction of patients with AMI bore no significant difference between two groups.The incidence of Killip≥ Ⅲ in group B was lower significantly than that in group A (7.5% vs.14.7%, P<0.01).②Reperfusion therapy was used more often in group B than in group A (78.5% vs.71.2%, P<0.05).And percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)therapy was used more often in group B than in group A (71.5% vs.61.0%, P<0.01).However, the rate of lytic treatment was lower in group B than that in group A (8.6% vs.16.3%, P<0.01).③ The percentage of use of antiplatelet drug and aspirin was both over 97.0%.The tidopidine was used more frequently in group A than in group B (54.9% vs.8.3%), and the clopidogrel and glycoprotein Ⅲ a/Ⅰ b antagonists was used more frequently in group B than in group A (83.8% vs.27.4%, 4.8% vs.0.7%,both P < 0.01 ).The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin Ⅰ receptor antagonist (ACEI/ARB) were administered more frequently in groupB than in group A (98.2% vs.93.5%, P<0.01), and the increasing trend of ARB was obvious (13.6% vs.4.4%, P<0.05), but the decreasing trend of ACEI was obvious also (84.6% vs.89.1%, P<0.01).Heparin/low molecular heparin, β-blocker and statin were used more often in group B than in group A (97.4% vs.94.8%, 80.1% vs.74.8%, 87.7% vs.82.4%, P<0.05 or P<0.01).④ In-hospital mortality, reinfarction, angina pectoris were lower in group B than in group A (4.6% vs.7.6%, 2.8% vs.4.8%, 8.4% vs.12.4%, all P<0.05).⑤ Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that reperfusion, antiplatelet drug, statin and heparin/low molecular heparin were associated significantly with in-hospital mortality (all P<0.05).Conclusion After guideline was issued by ACC/AHA in 2004, the regime of early reperfusion and drug treatment in China had followed more closely the recommendations of the guidelines.At the same time, in-hospital mortality,reinfarctions,angina pectoris were decreased.And the changes in strategy of early reperfusion, antiplatelet drug, statin and heparin/low molecular heparin are closely related with in-hospital mortality.However, current management of AMI in China has not followed the recommendations of guidelines closely.It is essential to promote the use of β-blocker and ACEI/ARB drug treatment in China in accordance with the guidelines.
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期649-655,共7页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
关键词 心肌梗死 急性 指南 早期再灌注 治疗 预后 Acute myocardial infarction Guideline Early reperfusion Therapy Outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Antman EM,Anbe DT,Armstrong PW,et al.ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44:671-719.
  • 2Braunwald E,Antman EM,Beasley JW,et al.ACC/AHA,2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-summary article a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina).J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:1366-1374.
  • 3Van de Werf F,Ardissino D,Betriu A,et al.Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.Eur Heart J,2003,24:28-66.
  • 4高润霖.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725. 被引量:4854
  • 5Hasdai D,Behar S,Wallentin L,et al.A prospective survey of the characteristics,treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin,the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes.Eur Heart J,2002,23:1190-1201.
  • 6Rogers WJ,Bowlby LJ,Chandra NC,et al.Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990-1993),observations from the national registry of myocardial infarction.Circulation,1994,90:2103-2114.
  • 7Carruthers KF,Dabbous OH,Flather MD,et al.Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes:does the practice match the evidence? The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE).Heart,2005,91:290-298.
  • 8Boden WE,Eagle K,Granger CB.Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:a comprehensive review of contemporary management options.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:917-929.
  • 9赵威,高炜,王贵松.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死临床指南知晓率及应用情况调查[J].心肺血管病杂志,2007,26(2):96-99. 被引量:8
  • 10Giugliano RP,Braunwald E.2004 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with STEMI:the implications for clinicians.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med,2005,2:114-115.

二级参考文献69

  • 1急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 2罗晓菡,段新杰.135例急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗的临床分析[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(8):724-724. 被引量:7
  • 3American Heart Association / Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees.Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care,part Ⅲ:adult advanced cardiac life support[J].JAMA,1992,268(16):2199-2241.
  • 4Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH,et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1999,34:890-911.
  • 5Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S, et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty? Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37 :1827-1835.
  • 6Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet,2002,359:373-377.
  • 7Krumholtz H, Murillo JE, Chen J, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for eligible elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA,1997,277 : 1683-1688.
  • 8中华心血管病杂志编委会,中华心血管病杂志,1996年,24卷,5期,328页
  • 9Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiolagy/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction ). J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34:890-911.
  • 10Janczak J, Krupienicz A, Roszczyk E, et al. PRIMARY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY versus THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY. Comparison of mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction - a single centre experience. Kardiol Pol, 2002,57:542-550.

共引文献4994

同被引文献264

引证文献32

二级引证文献401

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部