期刊文献+

审计质量、交易成本与商业信用模式 被引量:93

Audit Quality,Transaction Cost and Mode of Trade Credit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过考察审计质量与商业信用模式选择行为的关系,研究了独立审计在企业与供应商合约关系中节约交易成本的作用。以应付账款、应付票据和预付账款等商业信用模式的不同选择来衡量交易成本的大小。实证结果发现,审计质量越高时,交易双方更容易形成信任关系,从而更倾向于采取交易成本较低的商业信用模式;当宏观签约环境更好时,审计质量对减少交易成本的作用更大。这意味着审计不仅可以减少股东、债权人与公司之间的代理成本,在减少与供应商购销双方之间交易成本过程中也起着重要作用。 By examining the relation between audit quality and mode of trade credit, this paper explores the role of auditing in the contract of firm and its suppliers. Using accounts payable, bills payable and prepaid accounts as the measures of transaction cost, we find that, when the audit quality is higher, the supplier trust more with the firm and offer the credit terms with lower transaction cost; this relationship would be more obvious in better market environment. Our results indicate that auditing can be useful in reducing the agency costs not only with finns' shareholders and debt holders, but also with the suppliers.
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期77-85,共9页 Auditing Research
基金 教育部"博士研究生学术新人奖" 清华大学博士生科研创新基金 中央财经大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目资助
关键词 审计质量 交易成本 商业信用模式 信任 audit quality, transaction cost, mode of trade credit, trust
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1刘凤委,李琳,薛云奎.信任、交易成本与商业信用模式[J].经济研究,2009,44(8):60-72. 被引量:342
  • 2陆正飞,杨德明.2010.商业信用:替代性融资还是买方市场[A].北京大学工作论文.
  • 3Allen F., Qian J., Qian M., 2005. Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China, Journal of Financial Economics, 77: 57-116.
  • 4Bowen R.M., DuCharme L., Shores D., 1995. Stakeholders' implicit claims and accounting method choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20.. 255-295.
  • 5Burkart M., Ellingsen T., 2004. In-kind finance: a theory of trade credit, American Economic Review, 94: 569-590.
  • 6Fortin, S. and J. A. Pittman., 2007. The Role of Auditor Choice in Debt Pricing in Private Firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (3): 859-896.
  • 7Gaver, J. J. and J. S. Paterson, 2001. The Association between External Monitoring and Earnings Management in the Property-Casualty Insurance Industry. Journal of Accotmting Research 39 (2): 269-282.
  • 8Hui K.W., Klasa S., Yeung E., 2009. Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism, working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
  • 9Herbohn, K. and V. Ragunathan, 2007. The horse has bolted: revisiting the market reaction to going concern modifications of audit reports. Accounting & Finance 47 (3).. 473-493.
  • 10Kreps. D. and Wilson. R., 1982, "Reputation and Imperfect Information", Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253-279.

二级参考文献35

共引文献341

同被引文献1231

引证文献93

二级引证文献1108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部