期刊文献+

财政分权有利于贫困减少吗?——来自分税制改革后的省际证据 被引量:37

Does Fiscal Decentralization Aid for Alleviating Poverty
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从公共支出效率和公共支出结构两个角度,论述了财政分权和贫困减少之间的理论联系。一方面,财政分权通过增加亲贫式支出的配置效率来实现减贫目标;另一方面,财政分权加剧了地方政府间的竞争程度,而地区竞争会扭曲公共支出结构,阻碍减贫目标的实现。利用我国分税制改革后的省际数据发现:就北京、上海和天津而言,财政分权程度的增加恶化了贫困状况;而对于其他省份,财政分权程度的增加则有利于缓解贫困。 This paper sheds light on the relationship between fiscal decentralization and poverty reduction through the efficiency and structure of public expenditures. On the one hand, fiscal decentralization can alleviate poverty by improving the efficiency of propoor spending. On the other hand, fiscal decentralization will encourage competitions among local governments and distort the structure of expenditures, which will make the poor worse. Based on provincial panel data after the Taxation Sharing Reform in China, we find that more fiscal decentralization will worsen the rural poor for Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin, but for other provinces, more fiscal decentralization will make the rural poor better off. Increasing the propoor spending is still an important way for poverty reduction, especially for rural poverty.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期3-15,共13页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于亲贫式增长的农村公共支出结构研究"资助(编号:09BJL034)
关键词 财政分权 贫困减少 亲贫式支出 Fiscal Decentralization Poverty Reduction Pro- Poor Spending
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Ahmad, Junaid, Shantayanan Devarajan, Stui Khemiani and Shekhar Shah, 2006, Decentralization and Service Delivery [C], In Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 2Azfar, Omar, Satu Kahkonen, and Patrick Meagher, 2001, Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance : A Synthesis of Research Findings [R], IRIS Center, University of Maryland.
  • 3Bardhan, Pranab and Dili PMookherjee, 2005, Decentralizing Antipoverty Program Delivery in Developing Countries [J]. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 89, 675-704.
  • 4Bird, Richard M. , 1993, Threading the Fiscal Labyrinth : Some Issues in Fiscal Decentralization [J], National Tax Journal, Vol. 46, 207-227.
  • 5Brown, Charles C. and Wallace E. Oates, 1987, Assistance to the Poor in a Federal System [J], Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 32, 307-330.
  • 6Crawford, Gordon, 2008, Decentralization and the Limits to Poverty Reduction: Findings from Ghana [J].Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 36, 235-258.
  • 7Crook, Richard C. , 2003, Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction in Africa : the Politics of Local -Central Relations [J], Public Administration and Development, Vol. 23, 77-88.
  • 8Faguet, Jean - Paul, 2004, Does Decentralization Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia [J], Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 88, 867-894.
  • 9Gomanee, Karuna and Oliver Morrissey, 2002, Evaluating Aid Effectiveness against a Poverty Reduction Criterion [R], DESG conference, Nottingham.
  • 10Press. Hayek, Friedrich August, 1948, Individualism and Economic Order [M], University of Chicago.Press.

二级参考文献220

共引文献8598

同被引文献568

二级引证文献395

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部