期刊文献+

人格测验的项目反应过程与展开模型研究述评 被引量:5

Item Response Process and Unfolding Model in Personality Tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一些研究者提出了人格测验的项目反应理想点过程假设,并在此基础上开发了拓广等级展开模型(GGUM)用于现有人格测验的数据分析和新量表的建构,显示出了较优势模型更优良的一些性质。不过,现有项目反应过程的研究结果来自于大样本的调查,缺乏实验证据的支持,GGUM也存在不适用于分析多类别人格测验数据的局限性。未来需要对GGUM进行拓展,剔除其主观反应类别阈限对称的限定。此外,还要重视配对格式人格测验数据分析模型的研究和开发。 Personality assessment was reborn in industrial and organizational psychology,which promoted researchers to concern on quality and fairness in personality tests.Some researchers put forward the ideal point process hypothesis of item response in personality tests,by which they developed generalized grade unfolding model(GGUM) to analyze participants' response data on personality tests,and to construct some personality scales,and found that GGUM fit the data better than dominant models.However,some current researches on item response process were not based on experimental evidence from laboratory,but on investigations from large samples.In addition,current popular GGUM can not fit the categorical data in personality tests.In the future,GGUM must be extended and some models which fit the data on forced-choice personality test must be developed.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1986-1990,共5页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 江西省高校人文社会科学研究规划项目基金(XL1001)资助
关键词 人格测验 理想点过程 展开模型 personality test ideal point process unfolding model
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1邓稳根,王鹏,刘双双.采用传统方法检验LOT和LOT-R维度时的问题及其出路[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,24(4). 被引量:3
  • 2邓稳根,戴海琦,黄海,戴慧群.展开模型对EPQ反应数据的拟合调查[J].心理与行为研究,2009,7(4):300-303. 被引量:8
  • 3郭庆科,苗金凤,王昭.IRT展开模型及对非累积反应机制的检测[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):66-69. 被引量:10
  • 4Andrich, D., & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
  • 5Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Chan, K., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. (2001). Fitting item-response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 523-562.
  • 6Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W (2007). Constructing Personality Scales Under the Assumptions of an Ideal Point Response Process: Toward Increasing the Flexibility of Personality Measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88-106.
  • 7Coombs, C. H. (1950). Psychological Scaling Without a Unit of Measurement. Psychological Review, 57:148-158.
  • 8Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S,, Williams, B., & Mead, A. D, (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143-165.
  • 9Hattie, J., Jaeger, R. M., & Bond, L. (1999). Persistent methodological questions in educational testing. Review of Research in Education, 24, 393-446.
  • 10Hough, L. M. (1996). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M. D. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

二级参考文献28

  • 1郭庆科,周晶.Likert量表分析中不同IRT模型的有效性[J].心理学探新,2004,24(3):67-70. 被引量:36
  • 2Andrieh D, Luo G. A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993, 17 (3) : 253-276.
  • 3Andrich D. A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1996, 49 (2) : 347-365.
  • 4Roberts J S, Laughlin J E. A unidimensional item response theory model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1996, 20 (3) : 231-255.
  • 5Roberts J S, Donoghue J R, Laughlin J E. A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2000, 24 (1) : 3-32.
  • 6Chemyshenko 0 S, Stark S, Chan K Y, et al. Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001, 36 (4) : 523-562.
  • 7Stark S, Chernyshenko O S, Drasgow F, et al. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91 (1) : 25-39.
  • 8Hoijtink H. A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data. Psychometrika, 1990, 55 (4) : 641-656.
  • 9Cliff N, Collins L M, Zatkin J, et al. An ordinal scaling method for questionnaire and other ordinal data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1988, 12 (1) : 83-97.
  • 10van Schuur W H. Nonparametric unidimensional unfolding for multicategory data//Freeman J R. Political analysis: Vol 4. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. 1993:41-74.

共引文献15

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部