期刊文献+

Do land utilization patterns affect methanotrophic communities in a Chinese upland red soil? 被引量:4

Do land utilization patterns affect methanotrophic communities in a Chinese upland red soil?
原文传递
导出
摘要 Soil samples were collected from three plots under different land utilization patterns including degradation, farming, and restoration. The abundances of methanotrophs were quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the pmoA and 16S rRNA genes, and the community fingerprint was analyzed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) aiming at pmoA gene. Significantly lower 16S rRNA and pmoA genes copies were found in the degradation treatment than in farming and restoration. Higher abundances of Type I than those of Type II methanotrophs were detected in all treatments, The treatment of farming was clearly separated from degradation and restoration according to the DGGE profile by cluster analysis. The lowest diversity indices were observed in the F (farming plot), suggesting that the community structure was strongly affected by farming activities. There were significantly positive correlations between the copy numbers of pmoA also Type II-related 16S rRNA genes and soil available K content. Strong negative and positive correlations were found between Type I and soil pH, and available P content, respectively. We concluded that the vegetation cover or not, soil characteristics including pH and nutrients of P and K as a result of anthropogenic disturbance may be key factors affecting methanotrophic communities in upland soil. Soil samples were collected from three plots under different land utilization patterns including degradation, farming, and restoration. The abundances of methanotrophs were quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the pmoA and 16S rRNA genes, and the community fingerprint was analyzed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) aiming at pmoA gene. Significantly lower 16S rRNA and pmoA genes copies were found in the degradation treatment than in farming and restoration. Higher abundances of Type I than those of Type II methanotrophs were detected in all treatments, The treatment of farming was clearly separated from degradation and restoration according to the DGGE profile by cluster analysis. The lowest diversity indices were observed in the F (farming plot), suggesting that the community structure was strongly affected by farming activities. There were significantly positive correlations between the copy numbers of pmoA also Type II-related 16S rRNA genes and soil available K content. Strong negative and positive correlations were found between Type I and soil pH, and available P content, respectively. We concluded that the vegetation cover or not, soil characteristics including pH and nutrients of P and K as a result of anthropogenic disturbance may be key factors affecting methanotrophic communities in upland soil.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第12期1936-1943,共8页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(No. KSCX2-YW-Z-1020,KZCX2-YW-JC401) the Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 40871129)
关键词 DGGE land utilization METHANOTROPHS prnoA real-time PCR DGGE land utilization methanotrophs prnoA real-time PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Bremner J M, 1996. Nitrogen - total methods of soil analysis. In: Part 3 - Chemical Methods (Sparks D L, Page A L, Helmke P A, Loeppert R H, Soltanpour P N et al., eds.). Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 1085-1121.
  • 2Chen Y, Dumont M G, Cebron A, Murrell J C, 2007. Identification of active methanotrophs in a landfill cover soil through detection of expression of 16S rRNA and functional genes. Environmental Microbiology, 9(11): 2855-2869.
  • 3Chen Y, McNamara N P, Dumont M G, Bodrossy L, Stralis- Pauese Net al., 2008. The impact of burning and Calluna removal on below-ground methanotroph diversity and activ- ity in a peatland soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 40(2): 291-298.
  • 4Dedysh S N, Knief C, Dunfield P F, 2005. Methylocella species are facultatively methanotrophic. Journal of Bacteriology, 187(13): 4665-4670.
  • 5Dobbie K E, Smith K A, Prieme A, Christensen S, Degorska A, Orlanski P, 1996. Effect of land use on the rate of methane uptake by surface soils in northern Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 30(7): 1005-1011.
  • 6Fierer N, Jackson R B, 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(3): 626-631.
  • 7Fjellbirkeland A, Torsvik V, Ovrefis L, 2001. Methanotrophic diversity in an agricultural soil as evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of pmoA, mxaF and 16S rDNA sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 79(2): 209-217.
  • 8Fogel G B, Collins C R, Li J, Brunk C F, 1999. Prokaryotic genome size and SSU rDNA copy number: estimation of microbial relative abundance from a mixed population. Microbial Ecology, 38(2): 93-113.
  • 9Gulledge J, Ahmad A, Steudler P A, Pomerantz W J, Cavanaugh C M, 2001. Family- and genus-level 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for ecological studies of methan- otrophic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiolo- gy, 67(10): 47264733.
  • 10Hanson R S, Hanson T E, 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiological Reviews, 60(2): 439-471.

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部