期刊文献+

LDPE装置管式反应器紧急泄压联锁系统可靠性分析 被引量:4

Research on Reliability of Emergency Relief System of LDPE Tubular Reactor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 低密度高压聚乙烯(LDPE)装置反应系统的安全与紧急泄压系统的安全与可靠性密切相关。为评估紧急泄压安全联锁系统的安全要求及可靠性,采用精确的过程安全分析方法,对LDPE装置管式反应器紧急泄压联锁系统执行机构的冗余要求进行了分析。通过对泄压阀的开启及对泄压影响的研究,提出了LDPE反应器自分解泄压方程的修正模型,采用数值仿真方法研究了反应器内不同管段及全线自分解时紧急泄压阀开启数量、开启速度对反应泄压的关系。得出五取二以上的紧急泄压阀开启可以满足反应系统的紧急泄压要求。本研究结果确定了紧急泄压联锁系统执行机构的安全要求,为LDPE装置的联锁系统的安全完整性评估(SIL)提供了技术依据。文中还提出了反应过程的泄压系统设计要求,对提高装置的安全完整性具有借鉴意义。 The safety integrity of reaction system of low density polyethylene(LDPE) plant is mainly depending on the availability of emergency relief system.A state-of-the-art precise process safety analysis method was applied to evaluate the redundancy requirement of emergency relief valves of LDPE plant.Took relief valve opening characteristic into consideration,a modified emergency relief model was proposed by revising of the pressure relief model which was put forward by DuPont.Numerical simulation method was used to study run away situation in tubular reactor.The pressure fluctuation in reactor under different run away situations,e.g.relief valves operation strategy,valve operation speed as well as run away location were also studied.The conclusion of 2 out of 5 required relief valves under decomposition situation was obtained,which was benefit for the assessment of safety integrity level(SIL) of emergency SIS system.Detailed safety requirement specification of pressure relief system for reaction process was also discussed,which was benefit for improvement of safety integrity of process installations.
出处 《化工自动化及仪表》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第5期35-40,共6页 Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry
基金 国际合作重点项目(2003DF00044 2006DFB7300) 国家支撑计划项目(2006BAK02B02) 国家"863"计划项目(2007AA04Z430) 安徽省国际科技合作项目(08080703023)
关键词 高压聚乙烯 紧急泄压阀 安全完整性 自分解 可靠性 LDPE emergency relief valve SIL self decomposition reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1J.L.Rouvroye,E.G.Van Den Bliek.Comparing Safety Analysis Techniques[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2002,75:289-294.
  • 2J.L.Rouvroye,A.C.Brombacher.New Quantitative Safety Standards:Different Techniques,Different Results[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,1999,66:121-125.
  • 3Paris Stavranidis,Kumar Bhimavarapu.Pefformance-based Standards:Safety Instrumented Functions and Safety Integrity level[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2000,71:449-465.
  • 4Paris Stavranidis,Kumar Bhimavarapu.Safety Instrumented Functions and Safety Integrity Level (SIL)[J].ISA Transactions 1998,37:337-351.
  • 5Angela E.Summers,Viewpoint un ISA TR84.0.02-simplified Methods and Fault Tree Analysis[J].ISA Transactions 2000,39:129-131.
  • 6Angela E.Summer.IEC61511 and the Capital Project Process-A Protective Management System Approach[Z].
  • 7Lawrance,Bechman.Determining the Required Safety Integrity Level for Your Process[J].ISA Transactions,1998,37:105-111.
  • 8ANSI/ISA-TR84.00.02-2002-Part 2,Instrument Society of America[S].1999.
  • 9W.M.Goble.Control System Safety Evaluation and Reliability[S].ISA,1998.

共引文献13

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部