摘要
本文在《祁连、焉支山在新疆辩疑(上)》篇的基础上,从分析祁连、焉支山所在河西走廊生态经济特征、战略地位的角度及反证法论证了巴里坤山、哈尔里克山/东天山与汉代史籍中祁连、焉支山无关。
On the basic of Debate and Suspect on Whether Qilian Mountains and Yanzhi Mountains in Xinjiang（PartⅠ）,this article tries to analyzing the eco-economic characteristics and strategic position of Qilian Mountains and Yanzhi Mountains at area of Hexi Corridor and then by reduction ad absurdum,demonstrating that the Barkol hill and Karlik hill（Eastern Tianshan）have no relationship with the Qilian Mountains and Yanzhi Mountains which had mentioned in historic records of Han dynasty.
出处
《敦煌研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期62-69,132,共9页
Dunhuang Research
关键词
河西走廊的生态经济特征
战略地位
反证法
巴里坤/东天山与祁连山无关
Eco-economic characteristics of Hexi Corridor
Strategic position
Reduction ad absurdum
Barkol hill and Eastern Tianshan had
no relationship with Qilian mountains
