2Arnold, J. 1999. Affect in Language Learning [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3Ehrman, M. & Z. Dornyei. 1998. Interpersonal Dynamics in Second Language Education : The Visible and Invisible Classroom [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4Feez, S. 1998. Text-based Syllabus Design [M]. Sydney: N-tional Center for English Teaching and Research.
5Lemke, J. L. 1985. Using Language in the Classroom [M].Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
6Long , M. & G. Crookes. 1991. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design [J]. TESOL Quarterly 26: 27-55.
7Naiman, N. &H. H. Stern. 1978. TheG, ood Language Learner [ M ]. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
8Pica T., R. Kanagy & J. Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction [A]. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.). Tasks and LanguageLearning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
9Plough, I. & S. Gass. 1993. Interlocutor and task familiarity:Effect on interactional structure [A]. In G. Crookes & S.Gass (eds.). Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedun: Multilingual Matters.
10Richards, J. C. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2Nunan D. Designing Task for the Communicative Classroon [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1989.
3Ausubel, D. P. Educatinal Psychology: A Cognitive View [ M]. New York: Holt, Rinehart& Winston, 1978.
4Eckersley, C. E. Essential English Student Book III [ M ]. Longman, 1975.
5Daniel L. Stutllebeam. Evaluation Models [ M ]. Beijing University Press, 5007.
6Barfield, A. , Ashwell, T. , Carroll, M.. Exploring and Defining Teacher Autonomy [ A]. On Developing Autono- my, Proceedings of the 2001 CUE Conference, Shizuoka, Japan. Tokyo: JALT, 2001.
7Smith, R. C. Autonomy in Language Teacher Education [ M]. IALS, University of Edinburgh, 2001.
8Nunan, D. Learner Strategy Training in the Classroom: an Action Research [J]. TESOL Journal, 1996: 6.
