期刊文献+

颈髓损伤早期急诊手术的可行性及疗效评价 被引量:2

Evaluation of Feasibility and Treatment Efficacy of Immediate Spinal Cord Decompression for Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨颈髓损伤早期急诊减压内固定手术的可行性及疗效。方法:回顾性分析2000年6月~2007年6月我科治疗的颈髓损伤患者68例,按是否进行急诊手术分为急诊手术组22例和非急诊手术组46例。所有患者均采集一般资料、神经功能状况(入院时和最后一次随访时)、术后并发症、重症监护时间和住院时间等临床资料,并进行统计学分析。结果:2组患者在一般资料、受伤节段、手术方式、随访时间及入院时神经功能状况等方面均无统计学差异;最后一次随访时2组相比神经功能无显著性差异,但急诊手术组的并发症发生率、重症监护时间和住院时间均低于非急诊手术组。结论:颈髓损伤后早期急诊手术可行、安全,有利于减少术后并发症,但对神经功能的恢复无明显帮助。 Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and treatment efficacy of early emergency surgical decompression and stabilization for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Methods: Sixty- eight patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury (June 2000-June 2007) were retrospectively reviewed, in which 22 cases underwent emergency operation (≤24 h after spinal cord injury) and 46 late operation (〉24h after spinal cord injury). Detailed materials including general data, neurological function (in admission and in the most recent follow-up), complications, intensive care time and hospital stay were collected and statistically analyzed in all the patients. Results: There was no significant differences in general data, distribution of the injury level, the operation meth- od, follow-up time and neurological functions at admission between two groups. In the emergency operation group, the neurological functions were similar to those in the late operation group, but the postoperative complications were less common and the intensive care time and hospital stay were shorter. Conclusions: Immediate spinal cord decompression and stabilization are feasible and safe for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. The early intervention can effectively decrease the postoperative complications. However, it shows no significant effects on neurologic recovery.
出处 《神经损伤与功能重建》 2010年第6期422-425,共4页 Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划资助项目(No.2007BAI04B07)
关键词 颈椎 脊髓损伤 急诊手术 cervical spine spinal cord injury urgent surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1?ahika Liva Cengiz,Erdal Kalkan,Aysegul Bayir,Kemal Ilik,Alper Basefer.Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study[J].Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2008(9)
  • 2Hawryluk GW,Rowland J,Kwon BK,et al.Protection and Repair of the Injured Spinal Cord:a Review of Completed,Ongoing,and Planned Clinical Trials for Acute Spinal Cord Injury[].Neurosurgical Focus.2008
  • 3McKinley W,Meade MA,Kirshblum S,et al.Outcomes of Early Surgical Management Versus Late or no Surgical Intervention Af-ter Acute Spinal Cord Injury[].Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2004
  • 4Carlson GD,Gorden CD,Oliff HS,et al.Sus-tained Spinal Cord Compression:Part I:Ti me-dependent Effect on Long-term Patho-physiology[].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume.2003
  • 5Miko I,Gould R,Wolf S,et al.Acute Spinal Cord Injury[].International Anesthesiology Clinics.2009
  • 6McHenry TP,Mirza SK,Wang J,et al.Risk Factors for Respiratory Failure Following Operative Stabilization of Thoracic and Lum-bar Spine Fractures[].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume.2006
  • 7Urdaneta F,Layon JA.Respiratory Compli-cations in Patients with Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries:Case Report and Review of the Literature[].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2003
  • 8Schinkel C,Anastasiadis AP.The Ti ming of Spinal Stabilizationin Polytrauma andin Pa-tients with Spinal Cord Injury[].Current Opinion in Critical Care.2008
  • 9Vaccaro AR,Daugherty RJ,Sheehan TP,et al.Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury[].SPINE.1997
  • 10Rowland JW,Hawryluk GW,Kwon B, et al.Current status of acute spinal cord pathophysiology and emerging therapies:promise on the horizon[].Neurosurgical Focus.2008

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部