期刊文献+

电子射野影像系统在盆腔肿瘤放疗中的应用 被引量:1

Application of Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Pelvic Cancers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用电子射野影像系统分析我院行盆腔适形调强放疗病人的摆位误差情况,为临床上计划靶区(PTV)的设定提供参考依据。方法:选取行盆腔适形调强肿瘤病人21例,应用电子射野影像系统对每例患者每周分别拍摄正侧射野图像各1张,共获取210张图像,分别将图像与计划系统所形成的相应数字重建影像(DRR)进行比较,获取上下(X轴)、左右(Y轴)、前后(Z轴)方向的摆位误差。结果:21例患者X轴、Y轴、Z轴各方向的系统误差的标准差分别1.02,2.37,1.94mm,随机误差的标准差分别是1.35,2.24,2.30mm。X轴、Y轴、Z轴的摆位扩边值分别为3.49,7.51,6.46mm。结论:尽管应用真空垫、热塑网膜等体位固定方法,但由于各种原因,盆腔肿瘤放疗仍有一定的摆位误差,在设定盆腔靶区时建议左右、上下、前后分别外扩3.5,8,7mm。 Objective:To study the role of electronic portal imaging device(EPID)on verification of setup errors of conformal intensity modulated radiotherapy for pelvic cancers,and to provide reference data for planning target volume(PTV).Methods:For twenty one cases of pelvic cancers who received conformal intensity modulated radiotherapy,AP-PA and lateral EPID were performed every week during treatment.A total of 210digital photos were acquired and were compared with the results of digital reconstruction radiology(DRR)by planning system to calculate the setup error of X,Y,and Z axis.Results:The system error of setup error of X,Y,and Z axis in 21cases were 1.02mm,2.37mm,1.94mm,respectively,and the random error were 1.35mm,2.24mm,2.30mm,respectively.The margin of PTV(Mptv)was 3.49mm,7.51 mm and 6.46mm,respectively.Conclusion:Although patient fixation methods including vaccum cushion and thermal plastic mold were used,the setup error still existed for radiotherapy of pelvic cancers.We suggests the margin of planning PTV should be 3.5mm,8mm,and 7mm in direction of X,Y,and Z axix.
出处 《武汉大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第6期814-817,共4页 Medical Journal of Wuhan University
关键词 盆腔肿瘤 放射疗法 摆位误差 电子射野影像系统 Plevic Cancer Radiotherapy Setup Error Electronic Portal Imaging Device
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献45

  • 1郑步宏,潘建基,徐鹭英,陈传本,张瑜,张秀春.垫内置标记点法测量鼻咽癌适形放疗摆位误差的研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(3):218-221. 被引量:19
  • 2胡逸民 张红志 戴建荣 胡逸民 主编.治疗计划的设计与执行[A].胡逸民,主编.肿瘤放射物理学[C].北京:原子能出版社,1999.463-471.
  • 3ICRU. Rescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. ICRU Report 50. Bethesda: ICRU, 1993.
  • 4Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, et al. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol,2001, 58:155-162.
  • 5Zhu Y, Stovall J, Butler L, et al. Comparison of two immobilization techniques using portal film and digitally reconstructed radiographs for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:1233-1240.
  • 6Hunt M.The effect of positional uncertainties on the treatment of primary nasopharynx cancer[J].Med Phys,1989,16:456-464.
  • 7Stroom J C,de Boer J C,Huizenga H,et al.Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,43:905-919.
  • 8Stroom J C,Heijmen B J.Geometrical uncertainties,radiotherapy planning margins,and the ICRU-62 report[J].Radiother Oncol,2002,64(1):75-83.
  • 9Jef M M,Mary V G,Waller R B,et al.Prospective clinical evalution of electronic portal imaging device[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996,34:943-951.
  • 10Hurkmans C W,Remeijer P,Lebesque J V,et al.Set-up verification using portal imaging:review of current clinical pratice[J].Radiather Oncol,2001,58(2):105-120.

共引文献74

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部