摘要
目的 了解接受PCI治疗的ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的近期和长期预后.方法 DESIREⅡ为单中心回顾性注册研究,入选2003年7月1日至2005年9月30日在北京安贞医院接受血运重建治疗的6005例患者,2006年9月1日到11月30日对患者进行电话或门诊随访.入选其中接受PCI的STEMI和NSTEMI患者,通过生存分析比较两组之间的预后情况.不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)包括全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和再次血运重建.结果 共1009例患者,其中STEMI患者803例,NSTEMI患者206例,NSTEMI的患者高血压病史、陈旧心肌梗死和血运重建病史的比例高,处理多支病变的比例高(43.7%比34.4%,P=0.039),完全血运重建率高;两组患者的院内死亡率和MACCE发生率及长期预后(1年死亡率分别为96%和98%)差异无统计学意义,对长期预后有影响的因素为LVEF和血肌酐.结论 接受PCI的STEMI和NSTEMI患者临床情况有所差异,但是近期和长期预后相似.
Objective To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with those with non-STEMI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Method The DESIRE Ⅱ (Drug-Eluting Stent Impact on Revascularization Ⅱ) was a single-center registered retrospective study of coronary revascularization in our institution between July 2003 and September 2009.Data of demographics, clinical features and revascularization record of STEMI and non-STEMI patients from the DESIRE Ⅱ trial were analyzed. The patients were followed up in OPD or by telephone after discharge. MACCE (major adverse cardiocerebral events) including death, neo-myocardial infarction, stroke and revascularization were recorded. The clinical outcomes of patients of two types were evaluated. Results There were 6005 patients studied with a median follow-up of 566 days. A total of 1009 STEMI and non-STEMI patients were analyzed. The patients with non-STEMI ( n = 206) had higher prevalence of hypertension and history of higher frequency of myocardial infarction as well as revascularization compared with patients with STEMI ( n = 803). The patients with non-STEMI had higher ratio of treatment for multivessel disease (43.7% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.039). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality and long-term outcomes (one year survival rate: 96% vs. 98%)between patients with STEMI and non-STEMI. The predictors of 1-year mortality were LVEF and blood creatine.Conclusions Despite different chnical features, patients with STEMI and non-STEMI after PCI had similar both short-term and long-term outcomes
出处
《中华急诊医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第11期1156-1159,共4页
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金
国家重点基础研究发展规划资金资助项目(973计划) (2003CB517103)
关键词
心肌梗死
ST段
经皮冠状动脉介入
预后
Myocardial infarction
ST
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Prognosis