期刊文献+

电子信箱的可用性实验研究 被引量:1

Usability Experiment of Usual E-mailboxes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用认知走查和绩效评估的方法,研究了22名在校大学生使用163和Yahoo!两个常用电子信箱的操作和主观评价。研究表明:(1)此两个信箱可用性共同的问题有:用户都不知道如何在发送信件时将信件保存到"已发送"子目录中;(2)163信箱的可用性问题主要有:网络硬盘和记事本两个功能多余,在添加联系人时,163信箱只提供了常规模式添加联系人;(3)Yahoo!信箱的可用性问题主要有:用户在写信时无法找到通讯录,在通讯录中每个联系人的"姓"和"名"是分开的,这非常不符合中国人的习惯;(4)总的说来,163信箱的可用性程度整体上高于Yahoo!信箱。 The research studies the operation that how 22 university students use the daily e-mailboxes 163 and Yahoo! and the subjective evaluation by cognitive walkthrough and user performance testing.The research shows that(1) the same usability problem of the two mailboxes is that users do not know how to save the mail to the sub catalogue "Have been sent" while sending the mail.(2) the major usability problems of mailbox 163 are network hard disk and note book are surplus and while adding persons to the contact,mailbox 163 just offer the routine mode to add persons to the contact.(3)the usability problems of mailbox Yahoo! are users are unable to find the address book while writing letter and the "surnamed" and "name" of each person in the contact is separated and this does not accord with the Chinese habit at all.(4)on the whole,the usability degree of mailbox 163 is higher than mailbox Yahoo!.
出处 《人类工效学》 2010年第1期9-13,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
关键词 可用性 认知走查 绩效评估 操作时间 操作路径 usability cognitive walkthrough user performance testing operation time operation path
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1王d 汪安圣.认知心理学[M].北京大学出版社,1990..
  • 2JakobNielsen MarieTahir 孙学涛等译.专业主页设计技术[M].人民邮电出版社,2002..
  • 3KevinAirgid StephanieReindel.Flash设计可用性指南[M].清华大学出版社,2003..
  • 4ThomasA Powell.Web设计大全[M].机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 5王甦 汪安圣.认知心理学[M].北京大学出版社,1990..
  • 6Lewis C, Wharton C. Cognitive walkthroughs[A]. Helander M, Landauer TK, Prabhu P. Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed. ) [ M ]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.717-732.
  • 7Sears A. Cognitive walkthrough: understanding the effect of task- description detail on evaluator performance[J]. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 1999,11(3) : 185-200.
  • 8Wharton C, Lewis C, PolsonP. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide[A]. Nielsen J, Mack R.Usability inspection methods[M]. New York: Wiley, 1994.105-141.
  • 9Blackmon MH, Poison PG, Lewis C, et al. Automated cognitive walkthrough for the web(AutoCWW) [EB/OL].http://www.usabilityfirst. com/auto-evaluation/paper-Blackmon-etal. html, 2(I)2-04-29.
  • 10Blackmon MH, Poison PG, Kitajima M, et al. Cognitivewalkthrough for the web [ EB/OL]. http://staff, aist. go.jp/kitajima.muneo/English/PAPERS (E)/CHI2002. pdf,2002-02-24.

共引文献17

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部