摘要
以公司法规范为标准,对公司享有的债权,其实现的保障手段可分为公司法外、公司法内、公司治理内三个层次。合同、担保等公司法外方式,未能突破外部性瓶颈,保护效果有限;公司法内提供了法人格否认等具体制度,但大都是在权力配置外给予保护,存在着被动性和对债务公司的依赖性。两者都不能解决公司资产非正常减少危害债权的问题。同时,债权人与公司保持着密切的联系,债权人也是公司资产的供给者,却承担了不相称的经营风险,并随时为股东的机会主义行为买单。债权保护的有效手段,必须在公司治理范围内寻求,应赋予债权人对公司资产保有和维持的一定话语权。债权人保护现状和我国的实践探索也进一步印证了这一点。
According to the Company Law,the means of protecting the credit enjoyed by the company can be divided into three levels： means outside the Company Law,means within the Company Law and means of corporate governance.Means outside the Company Law have limited protective effect and means within the Company Law are dependent and passive to the debtor corporate,failing to solve the problem of credit endangered by non-normal decrease of the company＇s assets.The creditors,having close ties with the company and being suppliers for its assets,have to bear the disproportionate management risk and pay bills for the shareholders for their opportunistic behaviors.Effective means of credit protection must be sought within the framework of corporate governance and creditors should maintain their voice in the disposition of the company＇s assets,which is well confirmed by the status of creditor protection and practice of China.
出处
《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第5期58-64,共7页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
债权保护
公司治理
债权人
protection of credit
corporate governance
creditor
