期刊文献+

MHC-Ⅱ类抗原表位预测软件的对比评价 被引量:3

Comparative Assessment of Different Softwares for MHC-Ⅱ Antigen Epitope Prediction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较不同MHC-Ⅱ类抗原表位预测软件的优缺点,为后续应用提供依据。在众多HLA-Ⅱ类抗原表位中,选取HLA-DR的6个表位(DRB1*0101,0301,0401,0701,1101和1501)为代表,选取MHCBN数据库中的309条已知抗原表位的肽链为待测肽链。使用近年来常用的7个表位预测软件,根据不同软件的临界值确定入选结果数据,比较各软件所得结果与已有的实验结果之间的差距以确定其优劣。综合7个软件预测结果进行评价,得出NetMHCⅡ和NetMHCⅡpan所得结果准确率最高。可以用NetMHCⅡpan及NetMHCⅡ进行MHC-Ⅱ类分子抗原表位预测。不同软件HLA的各个亚型的预测所得指标不一致,提示综合运用不同软件对多肽表位进行预测十分必要。 To compare different softwares on the prediction efficacy of MHC-Ⅱ epitopes.From a number of HLA class Ⅱ subtypes,six HLA-DR loci(DRB1*0101,0301,0401,0701,1101 and 1501) were selected as representative HLA.309 peptides were chosen from MHCBN database as testers,of which the epitopes were well-studied by former experiments and classifled into four binding groups.Seven commonly used epitope prediction softwares were applied on the peptides and the binding data of each peptide were obtained by each software.The experimental data and software data of all peptides were compared in parellel.Five accuracy index were used to evaluate the software.The results showed that each software selected has made full epitope prediction on all peptides and HLA loci.However,the epitope predicting results from different softwares were inconsistent on each single HLA loci.The pooled results by each sofeware showed that the NetMHCⅡ and NetMHCⅡpan produced the highest accuracy to predict MHC-Ⅱ antigen epitopes. NetMHCⅡpan and NetMHCⅡ would be the best in the prediction of MHC class Ⅱ binding epitopes.Inconsistent results by different software implies that it is necessary to use different softwares to predict MHC-Ⅱ antigen epitopes.
出处 《生物医学工程研究》 2010年第2期128-132,共5页 Journal Of Biomedical Engineering Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30640033 30771240) 广东省自然科学基金重点项目(8251018201000002) 广州市属高校科研教学团队项目(B94118) 广东省医学科研项目(A2007272)
关键词 MHC-Ⅱ 表位预测 临界值 软件 比对 MHC-Ⅱ Epitope prediction Thresholds Software Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bian,Reidhaar-OlsonH J F,Hammer J.The use of bioinformatics for identifying class II-restricted T-cell epitopes[J].Methods,2003,29(3):299-309.
  • 2Doytchinova I A,D R Flower.Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes:coMFA and coMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201[J].J Med Chem,2001,44(22):3572-81.
  • 3Rothbard J B,Taylor W R.A sequence pattern common to T cell epitopes[J].EMBO J,1988,7(1):93-100.
  • 4Sturniolo T.Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices[J].Nat Biotechnol,1999,17(6):555-561.
  • 5Nielsen M.Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations[J].Protein Sci,2003,12(5):1007-1017.
  • 6Di Leo E.Tomato atopy patch test in adult atopic dermatitis:diagnostic value and comparison among different methods[J].Allergy,2009,64(4):659-663.
  • 7Nielsen M.Quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-DR molecule of known sequence:NetMHCIIpan[J].PLoS Comput Biol,2008,4(7):1000-1107.
  • 8Guan P.MHCPred:a server for quantitative prediction of peptide-MHC binding[J].Nucleic Acids Res,2003,31(13):3621-3624.
  • 9Nielsen M,Lundegaard C,Lund O.Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align,a novel stabilization matrix alignment method[J].BMC Bioinformatics,2007.8:238.
  • 10Kruger S.Identification of a naturally processed HLA-DR-restricted T-helper epitope in Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen type 1[J].J Immunother,2003,26(3):212-221.

同被引文献17

  • 1SICHERER S H.Epidemiology of food allergy[J].J Allergy Clin Immunol,2011,127(3):594-602.
  • 2BRAVO A,LIKITVIVATANAVONG S,GILL S S,et al.Bacillus thuring-iensis:A story of a successful bioinsecticide[J].Insect Biochem Mol Biol,2011,41(7):423-431.
  • 3BERNSTEIN I L,BERNSTEIN J A,MILLER M,et al.Immune responsesin farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides[J].En-viron Health Perspect,1999,107(7):575-582.
  • 4GAO Y,WU K,GOULD F,et al.Cry2Ab tolerance response of Helicoverpaarmigera(Lepidoptera:Noctuidae)populations from CrylAc cotton plant-ing region[J].J Econ Entomol,2009,102(3):1217-1223.
  • 5LEE S K,YE Y M,YOON S H,et al.Evaluation of the sensitization ratesand identification of IgE-binding components in wild and geneticallymodified potatoes in patients with allergic disorders[J].Clin Mol Allergy,2006,4:10.
  • 6GIZZARELLI F,CORINTI S,BARLETTA B,et al.Evaluation of allergenic-ity of genetically modified soybean protein extract in a murine model of oralallergen-specific sensitization[J].Clin Exp Allergy,2006,36(2):238-248.
  • 7RANDHAWA G J,SINGH M,GROVER M.Bioinformatic analysis for aller-genicity assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins expressed in in-sect-resistant food crops[J].Food Chem Toxicol,2011,49(2):356-362.
  • 8LADICS G S,SELGRADE M K.Identifying food proteins with allergenic po-tential:evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provideadditional tools[J].Regul Toxicol Pharmacol,2009,54(3S1):2-6.
  • 9VERMA A K,MISRA A,SUBASH S,et al.Computational allergenicityprediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops[J].Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol,2011,33(3):410-422.
  • 10林苏霞,王晓梅,刘志刚,曾梦雅,吴研,陈家杰.大豆主要过敏原Gly m Bd 30K的抗原表位区基因的克隆表达、纯化及免疫原性鉴定[J].大豆科学,2010,29(2):186-190. 被引量:9

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部