期刊文献+

手术机器人应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全性和有效性评估 被引量:3

Safety and Effectiveness of Surgical Robot in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价Da Vinci手术机器人辅助CABG术的安全性和有效性,为我国手术机器人的临床使用和配置提供循证信息和政策建议。方法通过文献检索收集国内外DaVinci手术机器人辅助CABG术的原始研究,提取手术安全性和有效性的相关信息并进行分析。结果在获得的13项相关研究中,2项属Ⅲ级证据,11项属于Ⅳ级证据。各研究中,机器人具体应用的环节有差异,尚无足够证据证实手术机器人辅助CABG术的安全性和有效性优于现有的微创CABG术和经典开胸CABG术,且机器人应用于CABG术存在明显的学习曲线。结论在条件成熟的地区,有必要适度发展手术机器人技术,但卫生行政部门应加以严格监管。 Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Da Vinci surgery assisted robot in coronary artery bypass grafting ( CABG) surgery, and to provide evidence - based information and policy recommendations for the clinical use of surgical robots. Method Using literature search to collect original studies on domestic Da Vinci surgical robot - assisted CABG surgery, we extracted relevant information of safety and efficacy of surgical and analyzed it. Result In the included 13 studies, two were evidences of grade Ⅲ, 11 were evidences of grade Ⅳ. The specific applications part of the robots were different, and there was no sufficient evidence on safety and efficacy to demonstrate CABG surgery assisted robot is superior to the existing minimally invasire CABG surgery and classic thoracotomy CABG surgery. Furthermore, robotic applications in CABG surgery had an obvious learning curve. Conclusion Surgical robotics can be developed if suitable, but the health administrative departments should he strictly regulated.
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2010年第6期47-52,共6页 Chinese Health Quality Management
基金 卫生部规财司课题<手术机器人技术评价>资助
关键词 冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG) 安全性 有效性 机器人手术 达芬奇(Da Vinci)机器人 全内镜冠状动脉旁路移植术(TECAB) Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ( CABG) Security Effectiveness Robotic Surgery Da Vinci Robot Total Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (TECAB )
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献7

共引文献221

同被引文献53

  • 1郑哲,胡盛寿,周玉燕.电视胸腔镜辅助下微创冠状动脉旁路移植术临床及随访结果[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(1):52-53. 被引量:14
  • 2高长青,杨明,王刚,王加利,李丽霞,赵悦,肖苍松,李佳春,周琪.全机器人不开胸心脏手术4例[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2007,23(1):19-21. 被引量:56
  • 3Shen L, Shan YS, Hu HM, et al. Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(12):e535-547.
  • 4Kim HI, Hur H, Kim YN,et al. Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893][J]. BMC Cancer, 2014, 14:209.
  • 5Lee JH, Lee CM, Son SY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Long-term oncologic results[J]. Surgery, 2014, 155(1):154-164.
  • 6Li ZX, Xu YC, Lin WL, et al. Therapeutic effect of laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in 106 patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. J BUON, 2013, 18(3):689-694.
  • 7Zhao XF, Jeong O, Jung MR,et al. A propensity score-matched case- control comparative study of laparoscopic and open extended (D2) lymph node dissection for distal gastric carcinoma[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(8):2792-800.
  • 8Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, et al. Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with DE lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(6):1702-1709.
  • 9Park do J, Han SU, Hyung W J, et al. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(6):1548-1553.
  • 10Garrett HE,Dennis EW,Debakey ME. Aortocoronary bypass with saphenous vein graft.seven-year follow-up[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,1973,(07):792-794.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部