期刊文献+

不同情景下质量管理实践与企业绩效模型的实证研究 被引量:25

An Empirical Research for the Effects of Contextual Factors on the Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Firm Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以我国西北地区通过质量管理体系认证的324家企业为样本数据,研究质量管理实践与企业不同绩效之间的关系模型,特别关注了创新绩效在其中的地位和作用,并且分析了行业竞争程度、企业发展阶段以及企业规模三项情景因素对于关系模型的调节影响作用。实证结果表明,质量管理实践不仅能够通过质量绩效和运作绩效来改善最终的经营绩效,而且可以借助创新绩效这一中介变量发挥积极的影响作用,但是质量管理实践对于经营绩效的直接作用并不显著。在考虑了情景因素后得出,行业竞争程度对于关系模型的调节作用不显著,而企业发展阶段和企业规模对于模型的关系强度有十分显著的调节影响。研究的意义在于肯定了质量管理活动和创新活动能够协调发展的观点,同时对于质量管理是否属于情景依赖的争论提供了必要的实证依据。 By exemplifying 324 firms in west-north China which have passed certifications of ISO quality management systems,this paper examines the relationships between quality management practices (QMP) and firm performance.The new model emphasizes innovation performance's status and moderating effects of three contextual factors on the above influencing relationships,which are industry competition level,firm development phase and firm scale.The results show that quality management practices can affect business performance not only by improving quality performance and operational performance,but also through the mediate variable namely innovation performance.Another conclusion is that quality management practices do not have positive impact on firms' business performance directly.Furthermore it can be concluded that firm development phase and firm scale will moderate the relationships between quality management practices and firm performance,while industry competition level doesn't.The paper affirms the viewpoint that quality management activities will accord with innovation activities and it provides valuable empirical evidence for the debate whether quality management is context-dependent.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期111-119,共9页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70672056 70872091)
关键词 质量管理实践 创新绩效 企业绩效 情景因素 实证研究 quality management practices innovation performance firm performance contextual factor empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Sousa R, Voss C A. Quality Management Re-visited: A Reflective Review and Agenda for Future Research[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20(1):91-109.
  • 2Choi T Y, Eboch K. The TQM Paradox: Relations among TQM Practices, Plant Performance, and Customer Satisfaction[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1998, 17(1):59-75.
  • 3Kaynak H. The Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and Their Effects on Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(4):405-435.
  • 4Lakhal L, Pasin F, Limam M. Quality Management Practices and Their Impact on Performance[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2006, 23(6):625-646.
  • 5Tari J J, Molina J F, Castejon J L. The Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Their Effects on Quality Outcomes [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 183(2):483-501.
  • 6Lex D. The Contingency Theory of Organizations[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
  • 7Flynn B B, Schroeder R G, Sakakibara S. The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage[J]. Decision Sciences, 1995, 26(5):659-691.
  • 8Dow D D, Samson D, Ford S. Exploding the Myth: Do all Quality Management Practices Contribute to Superior Quality Performance? [J]. Production and Operations Management, 1999, 8(1):1-27.
  • 9Rahman S, Bullock P. Soft TQM, Hard TQM and Organizational Performance Relationships: A Empirical Investigation[J]. Omega, 2005, 33(1):73-83.
  • 10Benner M J, Tushman M I. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: the Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2):238-256.

二级参考文献10

共引文献114

同被引文献257

引证文献25

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部