论审判权的限度——以最高人民法院司法解释权的合理界限为视角

Limits of Jurisdiction:Based on the Reasonable Boundary of the Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court

司法解释权被看作是广义的审判权应有的内容。实践中很多学者都认为审判权有入侵立法权的倾向,而入侵的途径就是最高人民法院的司法解释"立法化"的问题。我们在承认司法解释的重要作用的同时,也必须着手对其进行完善,明确其合理限度。最高人民法院的司法解释要符合社会主义法治理念和法律的精神,也要符合立法原意和法律原则。最高人民法院的司法解释要克服自身的问题,回归本义,只有这样,才能使司法解释工作顺利进行。

Judicial interpretation should be as broad jurisdiction over the content,but many scholars believe that the invasion tendency of jurisdiction to legislative appears in practice and the invasion of the way is the Supreme Court＇s judicial interpretation of ＂legislature＂ of the problem.We recognize the important role of judicial interpretation,but we must begin to perfect the clear reasonable limits：the Supreme Court＇s judicial interpretation of the rule of law to comply with the socialist ideals and spirit of the law and we must comply with the legislative intent and principles of law.The Supreme People＇s Court＇s judicial interpretation should overcome their own problems and return the original meaning,so as to make judicial interpretation of the work carried out smoothly.