期刊文献+

技术创新资源投入与产出绩效的关联性研究——基于电子与通讯设备制造行业的面板数据分析 被引量:42

Technological Innovation Resources Input and Output Performance: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data of MIETE in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术创新资源投入与产出绩效的关系是学术界一直关注的焦点之一。在回顾分析国内外相关文献的基础上,基于我国电子与通讯设备制造业1995—2008年的面板数据,引入非R&D投入指标对以往的分析指标进行完善,建立新的理论模型,实证回归分析了技术创新资源投入与产出绩效的关系。结果表明:R&D经费投入和非R&D投入对产出绩效具有正向影响,尤其是对发明专利拥有量的影响十分显著;而R&D人员投入却对不同的产出绩效指标产生不同的影响。最后就进一步提高我国电子与通讯设备制造业的产出绩效提出了具有针对性的政策建议。 The relationship of technological innovation resources input and output performance is one of the important research focuses in academic field.Under an overview of the literature reviews,and based on the panel data of the manufacturing industry of electronic and telecommunications equipment(MIETE) from 1995 to 2008,this paper establishes new empirical model by adding non-RD input to improve the previous indicators of output performance to analyze the relationship.The results show that RD capital input and non-RD input on output performance have significant positive effects,especially for owning inventive patent.Moreover,RD personnel input have different effects on different indicators.Finally,this paper gives suggestions on how to improve the output performance of MIETE in China.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期29-35,共7页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目(07JA630003) 华中科技大学自主创新基金研究项目(人文社会科学)"企业自主创新行为与知识产权管理的耦合机制"(2010AW021)
关键词 技术创新资源投入 产出绩效 关联性 面板数据 technological innovation resources input output performance linkage panel data
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Solow, R.M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, 70(1): 65-94.
  • 2Lucas, R.E. The mechanics of economic development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1): 3-42.
  • 3Scherer, F.M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions[J]. American Economic Review, 1965, 55(2): 1097-1125.
  • 4Schmookler, J. Invention and economic growth[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1966.
  • 5Grabowski, G.H. The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical, drug, and petroleum industries[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1968,76(2):292-306.
  • 6Hambrick, D.C., Macmillan, C.I. Efficiency of product R&D in business units: The Role of strategic context[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28(3): 527-547.
  • 7Lichtenberg, F.R., Siegel, D. The impact of R&D investment on productivity: New evidence using linked R&D-LRD data [J]. Economic Enquiry, 1991, 29(2): 203-228.
  • 8Mairesse, J., Hall, B. Estimating the productivity of research and development: An exploration of GMM Methods using data on French and United States manufacturing firms[R]. NBER Working Paper No.5501, 1996.
  • 9Klette, T.J., Johansen, F. Accumulation of R&D capital and dynamic firm performance: A not-so-fixed effect model[C]. Annales d'economie et de Statistique, No.49/50,1998:389-419.
  • 10Parisi, M.L., Schiantarelli, F., Alessandro, S. Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy[J]. European Economic Review, 2006, 50(8): 2037-2061.

二级参考文献47

  • 1王道平,陈佳.高管团队异质性对企业绩效的影响研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2004,24(11):58-62. 被引量:19
  • 2金麟洙.从模仿到创新--韩国技术学习的动力 (M)[M].北京:新华出版社,1998..
  • 3[4]翁君弈.企业组织资本理论:组织激励与协调的博弈分析.北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
  • 4[7]Thomas A.Stewart:Intellectual Capital:the new wealth of organization[M]New York:Doubleday Currency Publication, 1997.
  • 5[8]Nick Bontis:Intellectual Capital:An Explorary Study that Develops Measure and Models[J],Management Decision,vol.36,NO.2
  • 6[9]J.Coleman:Social capital in the creation of human capital[J],American Journal Sociology94,1988.
  • 7Andy Nelly, Mike Bourne, Mike Kennerley. Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operation & Production Management. Vol.20 No.10, 2000.
  • 8Kerssens-van Drongelen, Cook. Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and de velopment processes. R&D management, Vol.27,No.4,pp.345-359, 1997.
  • 9Danniel B Waggoner, Andy D Nelly, Mike P Kennerley.The forces that shape organizational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of production economics,1999.
  • 10Kanpan, R S & D P Norton. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Havard Business Review,September-October,pp.123-147,1993.

共引文献248

同被引文献858

引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部