员工对企业经济性薪酬的内隐分类与偏好研究被引量：16

An Empirical Study on Employees' Preferences toward the Implicit Taxonomy of Economic Compensation

导出

摘要员工根据个人的心理认知、情感体验或行为倾向,对企业提供的经济性薪酬项目进行的内隐分类,是研究员工对企业薪酬激励态度反应的理论基础。研究先以开放式问卷,归纳出我国企业常用的24项经济性薪酬,再对722名有效被试者进行了封闭式问卷调查,探索并验证了我国员工对企业经济性薪酬内隐分类的SPISA结构模型,包括工资类收入、绩效奖励、社保类福利、企业自主福利、津贴与补助五个部分。层级回归分析发现,不同性别、年龄、受教育程度、职位层次和企业性质的员工对五类经济性薪酬的偏好水平存在显著差异。相关研究结果对企业根据员工需求差异,在相同人工成本下提升经济性薪酬的激励效果具有重要启示意义。 The implicit taxonomy of economic compensation is formed by employees according to their cognitive,affect,and behavior intentions.In this study,an open-ended questionnaire was firstly used in gathering the 24 commonly used economic compensation items.Then we explored their implicit structure among 722 employees in ten cities of six provinces in China.Both EFA and CFA showed that Chinese employees＇ implicit taxonomy of economic compensation was a stable SPISA structure,including ″salary″,″performance reward″,″social insurance benefit″,″employer-Sponsored benefit″,″allowance and subsidy″.Hierarchical regression analysis showed that： age,gender,education,position level,and firm＇s ownership have different impacts on employees＇ preference toward each dimension of SPISA structure of economic compensation.The related results provided important practical implications of how to maximize the motivational effect of firms＇ economic compensation at a fixed level of cost.

作者龙立荣祖伟贺伟

机构地区华中科技大学管理学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期154-162,共9页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家自然科学基金项目"组织中员工经济性薪酬的心理计量机制研究"(70871047)

关键词经济性薪酬内隐分类薪酬偏好员工激励 economic compensation implicit taxonomy compensation preference employee motivation

分类号 F240 [经济管理—劳动经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Deci, E., Koestne, R., Ryan, R. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(6): 627-668.
2李卫东,刘洪,陶厚永.企业研发人员工作激励研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2008,30(11):35-42. 被引量：12
3Dulebohn, J.H., Werling, S.E. Compensation research past, present, and future[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2007, 17(2): 191-207.
4Williams, M.L., McDaniel, M.A., Nguyen, N.Y. A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaetion[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91(2): 392- 413.
5Watson, J., McNaughton, M. Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2007, 63(4): 52-62.
6Belfielda, C.R., Heywood, J.S. Performance pay for teachers: Detemainants and consequences[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2008, 27(1): 243-252.
7Baruch, Y., Wheeler, K., Zhao, X. Performance-related pay in Chinese professional sports[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2004, 15(1): 245-259.
8Gerhart, B., Milkovich, G.T. "Employee compensation: Research and practice[M] // Dunnette, M.D., Hough, L.M. Handbook of industrial psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1993:482-569.
9Chen, C.C., Ford, C.M., Farris, G.F. Do rewards benefit the organization? The effects of reward types and the perceptions of diverse R&D professionals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1999, 46(1): 47-55.
10Tsui, A. S., Wang, D. X., Zhang, Y. C. Employment relationship with Chinese middle managers: Exploring differences between state-owned and non-state-owned firms[M]//Tsui, A.S., Lau, C.M., et al. The management of enterprises in the People's Republic of China. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, 2002.

二级参考文献54

1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量：3527
2Steers, R M, Mowday, R T, and Shapiro, D L. The future of work motivation theory[J].Academy of Management Review, 2004, 29(3): 379-387.
3Badawy, M K. Managing human resources[J]. Research Technology Management, 1988, 2(3) : 379-387.
4Chen, C C, Ford, C M, and Farris, G F. Do rewards benefit the organization? The effects of reward types and the perceptions of diverse R&D professionals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1999, 46(1): 47-55.
5Manolopoulos, D. What motivates R&D professionals? Evidence from decentralized laboratories in Greece[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006, 179(4): 616-647.
6Jordan, G B. What matters to R&D workers[J]. Research Technology Management, 2005, 48(3): 23-32.
7Kim, B, and Oh, H. An effective R&D performance measurement system: Survey of Korean R&D researchers[J]. The International Journal of Management Science, 2002, 30: 19-31.
8Kim, B, and Oh, H. Economic compensation compositions preferred by R&D personnel of different R&D types and intrinsic values [J]. R&D Management, 2002, 32(1): 47-59.
9Chiesa, V, and Frattini, F. Exploring the differences in performance measurement between research and development: Evidence from a multiple case study[J]. R&D Management, 2007, 37(4) : 283-301.
10Chen, T Y, Chang, P L, and Yeh, C W. The study of career needs, career development programs and job satisfaction levels of R&D personnel: The case of Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003, 14(6): 1 001-1 026.