期刊文献+

领导风格、民族文化与组织承诺之间的关系研究 被引量:15

Study on the Relationship among Leadership Style, National Culture and Organizational Commitment
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用实证研究的方法分析中国和韩国企业的领导风格及组织承诺之间关系的差异。在中韩两国发放600份问卷进行实证分析,得到以下结论:中国和韩国比较时,中国相当于高个人主义国家,韩国相当于高集体主义国家。在中国和韩国,交易型领导和变革型领导都可以提升员工的组织承诺。但是,在中国,交易型领导对下属组织承诺的影响比变革型领导更大,交易型领导比变革型领导更能够获得员工的组织承诺。在韩国,变革型领导对下属组织承诺的影响比交易型领导更大,变革型领导比交易型领导更能获得员工的组织承诺。这个研究结论的意义是:在高个人主义的国家(文化)宜采用交易型领导,在高集体主义的国家(文化)宜采用变革型领导。 In this paper we empirically study the difference of organizational commitment under different leadership styles based upon the two cultures.We collected 600 questionnaires to testify hypothesizes.Our conclusions are as follows: China is a higher individualism and Korea is higher collectivism when the tow countries are compared.Transformational and transactional leadership styles can both enhance organizational commitment in the two countries.But transactional leadership can promote more commitment than transformational leadership in China,and transformational leadership promote more commitment than transactional leadership in Korea.That means transactional leadership is more suitable than transformational leadership in a higher individualism country(culture) and transformational leadership is more suitable in a higher collectivism country(culture).
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期178-185,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70572012 50539130)
关键词 交易型领导 变革型领导 组织承诺 跨文化管理 transactional leadership transformational leadership organizational commitment cultural difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1金钟大.跨文化背景下企业雇员组织承诺研究[D].清华大学,2006.
  • 2Lee, D.H., Kim, J.M. The relationships between national culture and preferred leadership style and compensation system:A comparison between Korean and Chinese crew[J]. Journal of Human Resource Management Research(S.korea), 2000, 1: 5 -26.
  • 3Bums, J.M. Leadership[M]. New York: Harper& Row, 1978.
  • 4Bass, B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations [M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
  • 5Becker, H.S. Notes on the concept of commitment[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1960, 66:32-42.
  • 6Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment[J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 63:1-18.
  • 7Hofstede, G. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values[M]. Abridged Edition. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980.
  • 8Triandis, H.C. Individualism and collectivism[M]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.
  • 9Yammarino, FJ., Dubinaky, A.J., Comer, L.U., et al. Women and transformational and contingent reward leadership: A multiple-level-of analysis perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40:205-222.
  • 10Kahai, S.S., Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J. Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context [J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14(4/5): 499-524.

二级参考文献87

共引文献270

同被引文献321

引证文献15

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部