摘要
关于网络服务提供者是否应为第三人提供的内容承担侵权责任,中国和美国的做法不同,中国把疏忽责任和过错责任相结合,而美国采取的是不承担责任原则。两种做法各有利弊,单独适用难以令人满意。若能在权衡的基础上适用混合责任或改进的疏忽责任,则解决了法学界的一大难题。
In response to the question of whether Internet service providers should be liable for materials to the third party,America and China practice differently.China has integrated negligence liability with fault liability,but America adopted the principle of non-liability.Each of the three approaches achieves the height of his ability,but applying a single one is far from satisfactory.If we can adopt the mixed liability or improve negligence liability on the basis of weighting carefully,then a tough problem in law circle is to be settled.
出处
《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第5期48-50,共3页
Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
关键词
网络服务提供者
间接侵权责任
疏忽责任
过错责任
不承担责任
Internet service providers
indirect infringement liability
negligence liability
fault liability
non-liability