期刊文献+

团队学习的整合系统模型——基于复杂动态系统范式的国外研究成果整合性研究 被引量:5

Integrated Systematic Model of Team-based Learning:an Integrated Study of related Overseas Researches Based on the Complexity and Dynamic Paradigm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在复杂动态系统范式的指导下,我们采用多元科际研究法对国外团队学习的相关理论进行归纳和演绎,提出了一个团队学习的整合系统模型。研究表明,有效的团队学习需要团队成员间建立对话性空间,在这个对话性空间中,"分享"、"协作建构"和"建设性冲突"等传播行为是平衡的。然而,仅仅发现这一点是不够的。在团队学习中,"交流什么"、"跟谁交流"以及"为什么交流"等问题也是非常关键的。因此,模型中"团队自反性"、"团队活动"、"边界跨越"、"存储"和"恢复"是团队学习的五个核心过程变量。除此之外,我们的模型还对团队学习的输入、催化应急状态以及学习结果等因素也进行了整合。 Under the direction of the complexity and dynamic paradigm, we made an integrated induction and deduction study on team-based leaning literatures overseas, on the basis of which, we constructed a theoretical model of team-based learning. Researches indicated that a conversational space is quite necessary for effective team-based learning, where the interactive activities, such as "sharing","cooperate construction", and "constructive conflict" are balanced. But to discover this is not enough. In team-based study, the issue of "communicate what", "communicate with whom" and "communicate for what" are also crucial. In this study, we take the team as a whole and elaborated team-based learning process and outcomes. On the one hand, this model is descriptive, which has described what a team should do to achieve an effective leaning (sharing, cooperation construction and constructive conflict, storage and retrieve). On the other hand, the model is prescriptive. It gave an explicit and clear indication to achieve effective team-based learning.
出处 《远程教育杂志》 CSSCI 2010年第6期3-11,共9页 Journal of Distance Education
基金 2009年教育部人文社科规划项目"普通高校网络有效教学模式研究--以陕西省四所普通高校网络教育学院中的网络教学为例"(编号:09YJA880084)阶段性研究成果 陕西师范大学研究生创新基金项目"陕西省普通高校网络有效教学模式研究"(编号:2010CXS037)的支持
关键词 团队学习 系统模型 复杂动态系统范式 整合性研究 Team-based learning Integrated systematic model Complexity and dynamic paradigm Integrated study
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1[美]彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼:学习型组织的艺术与实践[M].北京:中信出版社,2009,10:455.
  • 2Kozlowski, S. W. , & Bell, B. S. Team learning, development and adaptation. In Valerie Sessa, & Manuel London (Eds.), Work group learning. Understanding,improving & assessing how groups learn in organizations. [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates. 2008. 15-44.
  • 3Jorg, T. Complexity theory and the reinvention of reality of education. In B. Davis, R. Luce Kapler, & R. Upitis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 comptexityscience and educational research conference[M]. University of Alberta; Institute for Complexity and Education. 2004. 121- 146.
  • 4Mathieu, J. , Maynard, M. T. , Rapp, T. , & Gilson, L. Team effectiveness 1997 -2007, A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future[J].Journal of Management, 2008(34): 410- 476.
  • 5Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., &. Jundt, D. Teams in organizations: From input process-output models to IMOI models [J ]. Annual Review ofPsychology, 2005 (56) : 517-543.
  • 6Dechant, K. , Marsick, V. J. , & Kasl, E. Towards a model ofteam learning[J]. Studies in Continuing Education, 1993,15(1): 1-14.
  • 7Mathieu, J. , Maynard, M. T. , Rapp, T. , & Gilson, L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future[J]. Journal of Management, 2008 (3): 4410-476.
  • 8West, M. A. , Hirst, G. , Richter, A. , & Shipton, H. Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2004,13(2) : 269-299.
  • 9Dechant, K. , Marsick, V. J. , & Kasl, E. Towards a model of team learning[J]. Studies in Continuing Education, 1993,15(1) 1-14.
  • 10Edmondson, A. C. Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999 ,44 (2) : 350-383.

共引文献3

同被引文献105

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部