摘要
目的观察大剂量甲泼尼龙(HDMP)和大剂量丙种球蛋白(HDIVIG)冲击治疗重症特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)的短期疗效。方法 32例血小板<10×109/L的成人重症ITP患者随机分成HDMP和HDIVIG两组。HDMP组18例,给予甲泼尼龙1.0g/d,连用3d,接泼尼松1.5mg/(kg·d)。HDIVIG组14例,给予丙种球蛋白0.4g/(kg·d),连用3d,接泼尼松1.5mg/(kg·d)。治疗后7~10d测血小板数目。结果 HDMP组和HDIVIG组血小板上升至20×109/L需(4.1±1.8)天和(3.3±1.6)d。达50×109/L分别为(6.5±2.7)d和(5.9±2.5)d,差异均无统计学意义(P分别>0.20和>0.50)。结论大剂量甲泼尼龙和大剂量丙种球蛋白治疗成人重症ITP短期提升血小板疗效相似。甲泼尼龙相对廉价,可广泛使用。
Objective To compare the short-term response between high dose methylprednisolone ( HDMP) and high dose intravenous immunoglobulin( HDIVIG) in treating adults with severe idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura( ITP). Methods Thirty-two adults with severe ITP and a platelet count below 10 × 10^9 /L were randomized to receive either 1. 0 g/( kg·d) ( n = 18; group HDMP) or 0. 4 g/kg/d ( n = 14; group HDI-VIG) for 3 consecutive days,after that,every case was administered with prednisone[1. 5 mg/( kg·d) =. Platelet counts were measured daily up to day 7 ~ 10. Results The days platelet ascending to 20 × 10^9 /L and 50 × 10^9 /L were( 4. 1 ± 1. 8) and( 6. 5 ± 2. 7) respectively in the HDMP group compared with( 3. 3 ± 1. 6) and ( 5. 9 ±2. 5) respectively in the HDIVIG group. There was no significant difference in the time platelet ascending to the above counts between the two groups with P 〉0. 20 and P〉 0. 50 respectively. Conclusion Both HDMP and HDIVIG treatments to severe ITP in adults are effective. The short-term responses of the two agents are similar. In contrast to intravenous immunoglobulin,methylprednisolone is cheep,so it may be widely used.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2010年第34期29-30,共2页
China Practical Medicine