期刊文献+

传统企业与高新技术企业IPO定价多因素模型研究 被引量:2

The Research on Tradtional and Hi-Tech Shanghai Stock Exchange Listed Companies'IPO Pricing Multifactor Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文以2002年到2010年3月在上交所A股市场发行上市的传统企业和高新技术企业为样本,比较研究了对两类企业IPO定价有显著影响的内外部因素。在此基础上建立两类企业IPO定价多因素模型。描述性统计结果表明,高新技术企业的研发能力、偿债能力、成长性优于传统企业;传统企业的周转能力优于高新技术企业。IPO定价多因素模型表明,对传统企业IPO价格有显著影响的因素是每股收益、发行股份和GDP增长率;对高新技术企业IPO价格有显著影响的因素是每股收益、GDP增长率、发行股份以及持有大专以上文凭人数占总劳动力比重。 Based on the sample of traditional and hi-tech listed companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2002 to 2010,research on the internal and external determinants of the two types of companies'IPO price is conducted and then established IPO pricing multifactor models respectively.The descriptive analysis indicates that averagely hi-tech companies are better than traditional in respect of RD,liquidity,leveraging and potential growth,but traditional companies are better than hi-tech regarding inventory and receivables turnover.The established IPO pricing multifactor models show that earnings per share,number of shares issued and GDP growth rate have significant impact on traditional companies'IPO price.In terms of Hi-Tech companies,besides the above three factors,the percentage of employees with junior college diploma or above also has significant impact on IPO price.
作者 刘佳
出处 《科学技术与工程》 2010年第33期8347-8351,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
关键词 传统企业 高新技术企业 首次公开募股(Initial PUBLIC offerings IPO)定价 多因素模型 traditional company hi-tech company IPO pricing multifactor model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Betty R,Riffe S,Thompson R.IPO pricing with accounting information.http://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu.2000-04.
  • 2Bhagat S,Rangan S P.IPO valuation in the new and old economie.AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings.SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=479541.2003-02.
  • 3檀向球,周维颖,夏宽云.“绩优成长股”股票定价模型研究[J].财经研究,2001,27(6):36-42. 被引量:16
  • 4李博.多因素资产定价模型的实证研究[J].商业研究,2003(21):54-58. 被引量:6
  • 5李博.多因素资产定价模型的实证研究[J].Finance,1992,47(2):427-465.
  • 6陈信元,陈冬华,朱红军.净资产、剩余收益与市场定价:会计信息的价值相关性[J].金融研究,2002(4):59-70. 被引量:195
  • 7Fama E F,French K R.Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies.The Journal of Finance,1996;51(1):55-84.
  • 8Fama E F,Frech K R.The cross-section of expected stock returns.The Journal of Finance,1992;47(2):427-465.
  • 9Chen Nai-fu,Roll R,Ross S A.Economic forces and the stock market.Journal of Business,1986;59(3):383-403.
  • 10檀向球.股票相对内在价值多因素估值模型研究--对沪深两市A股的实证分析.申银万国证券股份有限公司,2003.

二级参考文献15

共引文献214

同被引文献29

  • 1刘志彪,徐天舒.培育“专精特新”中小企业:补链强链的专项行动[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2022(1):23-32. 被引量:35
  • 2BARRY C B,et al.The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies:Evidence from the going-public process[J].The Journal of Finance Economics,1990,27(2):447-471.
  • 3DAVID P B.A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues[J].Journal of Finance,1982,37(4):955-976.
  • 4IVO WELCH.Seasoned offerings imitation costs,and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J].Journal of Finance,1989,44(2):421-450.
  • 5LAWRENCE M,et al.How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues[J].Journal of Financial Economies,1989,24(2):343-361.
  • 6KEVIN R.Why New Issues are Underpriced?[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1986,15(1/2):187-212.
  • 7JOHN H,ALAN W.The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s[J].American Economic Review,1993(83):259-264.
  • 8HOLINSTROM B.Agency Costs and Innovation[J].Journal of Economic Behaviour and organization,1989(12):305-327.
  • 9GEORGE A A.The market for“Lemons”:Quality Uncertainty and the market mechanism[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970,84(3):488-500.
  • 10LOCKETT A,MURRAY G,WRIGHT M.Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms[J].Research Policy 2002,31(6):1009-1030.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部