债务加入研究

ON Debt Joining

债务加入是一项具有高度实践性的民事法律制度,司法实践中存在大量与此相关的法律问题。债务加入涉及多方主体的利益,由于我国立法中没有对其加以明确的规定,使得司法实践中的适用较为混乱,这是目前司法审判中的一个突出难点。理论和实务上关于债务加入的认定和解释都有争议,应建立债务加入自身的理论体系,既认识到其与免责的债务承担、第三人代为履行、保证等制度在目的上具有相似性,但又在具体的制度内容、要件和效力功能等方面都存在差异。应当承认债务加入是一项相对独立的民事法律制度,在我国《合同法》中应建立债务加入制度或通过最高人民法院司法解释制度确立债务加入的具体规则,在司法实务中建立相对清晰的裁判规则。

Debt joining is a civil law practice with high applicability.In judicial practice,there are many problems concerning to multi-party debt joining.Since it is not yet clearly defined,debt joining poses a great difficulty in judicial judges.As there are so many disputes over how to define and explain debt joining in both theory and practice,it is necessary to establish the debt joining system of its own,and form a relatively clear judicial rule.