期刊文献+

社会支持对外伤性截瘫患者应付方式及生活质量的影响 被引量:5

Effect of social support on coping style and life quality of patients with traumatic paraplegia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨社会支持对外伤性截瘫患者应付方式及生活质量的影响。方法将60例患者以社会支持评分(SSRS)分组,社会支持总分〈35分为低社会支持组,〉45分为高社会支持组,比较两组应付问卷(WOCS)、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQCL—BREF)评分情况,并进行相关分析。结果印例外伤性截瘫患者SSRS总分及主观支持、客观支持、支持利用度因子评分分别为(38.28±4.92),(23.28±5.21),(11.22±3.16),(8.54±1.97)分。其中〈35分者(低分组)22例;〉45分者(高分组)17例;35~45分者21例。社会支持高分组外伤性截瘫患者生理领域、心理领域、社会关系领域、环境领域评分均高于社会支持低分组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。结论社会支持程度对伤性截瘫患者应付方式及生活质量具有重要影响,良好的社会支持有助于患者采取积极地应付方式,提高患者的生活质量。 Objective To investigate the impact of social support on coping style and life quality of patients with traumatic paraplegia. Methods According to social support rating scale ( SSRS), 60 cases were divided into two groups: low social support group (total social support score lower than 35 ) and high social support group ( total social support score higher than 45 ). Scores of WOCS and WHOQCL-BREF were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was conducted. Results Average scores of SSRS, subjective support, objective support and support utilization of the 60 cases were ( 38.28 ± 4.92 ), ( 23.28 ± 5.21 ), (11.22 ±3.16) and (8.54 ± 1.97), respectively. There were 22 cases lower than 35 points (low score group), 17 cases higher than 45 points (high score group), and 21cases between 35 and 45 points. Scores of physiological, psychological, social relations an.d environment dimension of the high social support group was significantly higher than those of the low social support group, and there was significant difference(P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions The degree of social support has an important impact on coping style and life quality of traumatic paraplegia patients. Well social support helps patients take active behaviors and improve the quality of life.
作者 沈传侠
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2010年第32期3871-3873,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 截瘫 社会支持 应付方式 生活质量 Paraplegia Social support Coping style Life quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

共引文献5075

同被引文献42

  • 1罗晓梅,张映芬,陈尔.乳腺癌术后患者家庭支持与生活质量的相关性研究[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2010,17(12):63-64. 被引量:21
  • 2王海忠,薛龙.晚期癌症患者负性心理因素与预后的关系[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(2):103-103. 被引量:8
  • 3肖水源.社会支持评定量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:127-127.
  • 4姜乾金.领悟社会支持量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):131-132.
  • 5Lev EL, Owen SV. A measure of self-care self-efficacy[J]. Res Nurs Health, 1996, 19 (5): 421-429.
  • 6Cao LP,Song JL,Yi XP, et al. Double inhibition of NF-kap-pa B and XIAP via RNAi enhances the sensitivity Of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine[J]. Oncol Rep, 2013, 29 (4): 1659-1665.
  • 7Buneker CK, Yu R, Deedigan L,et al. IFN-gamma combined with Targeting of XIAP leads to increased apoptosis - sensitization of TRAIL resistant Pancreatic carcinoma cells[ J]. Cancer Lett, 2012,316 (2) : 168-177.
  • 8Gift AG,Jablonski A, Stommel M, et al. Symptom clusters in elderly patients With lung cancer[J]. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2004, 31 -(2) : 202-212.
  • 9Mosher CE, Duhamel KN, Egert J, et al. Self - efficacy for coping with Cancer in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients :associations with barriers to pain management and distress [J]. Clin J Pain, 2010, 26 (3) : 227-234.
  • 10Liang SY, Yates P, Edwards H,et al. Opioid-taking self-efficacy amongst Taiwan Residents outpatients with cancer[ J]. Support Care Cancer, 2012, 20 (2) : 199-206.

引证文献5

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部