期刊文献+

多属性群体决策的水文预报择优及组合方法 被引量:5

Hydrological forecasting preferred and combination based on multi-attribute group decision
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对水文预报在参数受限条件下精度不高的问题,提出一种基于多属性群体决策的水文预报择优及组合方法.该方法首先建立预报正确率、确定性系数、合格区间、发生可能性四个决策属性;然后依靠理想模型给出属性权值的确定方法,并采用OWG和OWGA加以集结;最终基于评测值的序关系构成与实测值更为接近的预报区间.实验表明:该方法能够从多种预报方案中选择出相对误差较小的预报值,并形成一种高精度的组合预报模型,将预报提升一个等级. According to the problem of low accuracy in hydrological forecasting with the condition of parameters constrained, a hydrological forecasting preferred and combination method was put forward based on multi-attribute group decision. Firstly, the paper built four decision attributes forecasting correct rate, certainty coefficient, qualified interval, occurrence possibility, then gave the attribute weights in accordance with an ideal model, and assembled attribute values by using OWG and OWGA operator, finally constructed the forecasting interval which close to measured data based on evaluation sequence. The results show that.. This method can effectively select forecasting values with smaller relative error from multiple forecasting models, and combine to a hydrological forecasting model with higher forecasting accuracy, improve the level of forecasting value.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期2315-2320,共6页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(2006AA01A126) 国家自然科学基金(50279041) 陕西省重点实验室资助项目(05JS378)
关键词 多属性群体决策 水文预报 预报择优 预报组合 multi-attribute group decision hydrological forecasting forecasting preferred forecasting combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Shamseldin A Y, O'connor K M, Liang G C. Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall runoff models[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1997, 197:203 -229.
  • 2Xiong L H, Shamseldin A Y, O'connor K M. A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 245:196- 217.
  • 3周文坤.一种不确定型多属性决策的组合方法[J].系统工程,2006,24(2):96-100. 被引量:24
  • 4Nakahara Y, Sasaki M, Gen M. On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients[J]. Journal of Computer Industrial Engineering, 1992, 23(2): 301 304.
  • 5Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988, 18: 183-190.
  • 6樊治平,姜艳萍.基于OWG算子的不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(1):32-36. 被引量:49
  • 7Xu Z S. On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AttP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 126(3): 683-687.
  • 8齐照辉,张为华,范玉珠.一种新型的多属性决策权重计算方法[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(3):36-39. 被引量:19

二级参考文献27

  • 1樊治平,赵萱.多属性决策中权重确定的主客观赋权法[J].决策与决策支持系统,1997(4):89-93. 被引量:95
  • 2严鸿和,陈玉祥,许昭明,杨皖苏.专家评分机理与最优综合评价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(2):19-23. 被引量:77
  • 3朱方霞,陈华友.基于可能度的决策矩阵排序的一种新方法[J].系统工程,2005,23(7):29-32. 被引量:12
  • 4许叶军,达庆利.不确定型多属性决策的权系数确定及其应用[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(5):434-436. 被引量:40
  • 5Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple attribute decision making:methods and applications[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1981.
  • 6Saaty T L.A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J].Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1977,15:234~281.
  • 7Chu A T W,Kalaba R E,Spingarn K.A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets[J].Journal of Optimization Theory and Application,1979,27:531~538.
  • 8Hwang C L,Lin M J.Group decision making under multiple criteria:methods and applications[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1987.
  • 9Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple attribute decision making[M].Berlin Heidelberg,New York:Springer-Verlag,1981.
  • 10Yang Jian-Bo,Sen Pratyush.A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on systems,Man,and Cybernetics,1994,24(10):1458-1473.

共引文献88

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部