摘要
目的观察桩冠根管预备对根尖充填物存留的影响,探讨根尖充填术的可行性。方法选取需行桩冠修复且根充完善的143个根管进行根冠预备,根据根充材料分为Vitapex组、AH—plus组、碘氯仿组,根冠预备后通过X线牙片检查各组根尖充填物的存留情况。同时对根冠预备后根尖部充填物丢失的根管再行根尖充填术,并摄X线牙片观察其充填效果。结果Vitapex组根备后根尖部充填物存留率为84.1%(37/44),AH—plus组根备后根尖部充填物存留率为97.1%(33/34),碘氯仿组根备后根尖部充填物存留率为100.0%(65/65)。AH—plus、碘氯仿组根备后根尖部充填物存留率均明显高于Vitapex组(均P〈0.05),AH—plus、碘氯仿组间并无明显差异(P〉0.05)。根备后根尖部充填物丢失的8个根管再次行根尖充填术,X线牙片均显示根尖部根充完善,符合临床要求。结论桩冠根管预备过程中有部分根管根尖充填物会脱落,可通过取模后及时行根尖充填术予以补救。AH—plus糊剂可能是根充材料中相对较好的选择.
Objective To investigate the effect of post space preparation on the persistence of apical obturation material. Methods One hundred and forty-three roots with perfect canal filling were divided into three groups according to root canal filling materials-Vitapex group, AH-plus group and indo-chloroform group. After post space preparation all roots underwent X-ray examination for investigation on apical obturation material persistence of three different materials. Roots with apical obturation material lost due to post space preparation were refilled by apical obturation technique. X-ray examination was taken to detect apical filling. Results The persistence rates of Vitapex group, AH-plus group and indo-chloroform group were 84.1% (37/44), 97.1% (33/34) and 100.0%(65/65), respectively. The rate for Vitapex group was significantly lower (P 〈0.05) than that of AH-plus and indo-chloroform groups; while there were no differences between the last two groups (P 〉0.05). After adaption of apical obturation technique the X-ray examination indicated consummate apical obturation in 8 roots which lost apical obturation material. Conclusion Apical obturation material might be lost during post space preparation, which can be retrieved by apical obturation technique after impression. Moreover,AH-plus paste might be the more suitable root canal filling material for the teeth that need post crown restoration.
出处
《浙江医学》
CAS
2010年第11期1648-1650,共3页
Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词
桩冠
根管预备
根尖部充填物
根尖充填术
Post crown Post space preparation Apical obturation material Apical obturation technique