摘要
基于康德对两种判断力的区分,文章分析了《判断力批判》中审美判断的合法性。分析认为:作为反思性判断的审美判断被规定为具有诸认识能力间功能自由的特点,而想像力的自由解放使得功能间的自由游戏成为可能;并且,想像力的形象综合具体地把这种自由游戏呈现为愉悦的情感,从而使审美判断成为可能。文章最后指出了康德审美判断的困难。
Based on Kant's distinction between two kinds of judgments, the article analyzes the legitimacy of the aesthetic judgments in "Critique of Judgment". The first, the reflective judgments with aesthetic judgments are defined as functional freedom among cognitive abilities. The second, the liberation of imagination makes the functions free play. Furthermore, the integrating of image specifically makes this free game as pleasant emotions, and makes aesthetic judgments possible. Finally, the article pointed out Kant's difficulties of aesthetic judgments.
出处
《武汉科技学院学报》
2010年第6期1-5,共5页
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Science and Technology
基金
湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2009b268)
关键词
审美判断
想像力
功能
自由
aesthetic judgments
imagination
function
free