期刊文献+

康德审美判断的合法性

The Legitimacy of Kant's Aesthetic Judgments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于康德对两种判断力的区分,文章分析了《判断力批判》中审美判断的合法性。分析认为:作为反思性判断的审美判断被规定为具有诸认识能力间功能自由的特点,而想像力的自由解放使得功能间的自由游戏成为可能;并且,想像力的形象综合具体地把这种自由游戏呈现为愉悦的情感,从而使审美判断成为可能。文章最后指出了康德审美判断的困难。 Based on Kant's distinction between two kinds of judgments, the article analyzes the legitimacy of the aesthetic judgments in "Critique of Judgment". The first, the reflective judgments with aesthetic judgments are defined as functional freedom among cognitive abilities. The second, the liberation of imagination makes the functions free play. Furthermore, the integrating of image specifically makes this free game as pleasant emotions, and makes aesthetic judgments possible. Finally, the article pointed out Kant's difficulties of aesthetic judgments.
作者 齐志家
出处 《武汉科技学院学报》 2010年第6期1-5,共5页 Journal of Wuhan Institute of Science and Technology
基金 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2009b268)
关键词 审美判断 想像力 功能 自由 aesthetic judgments imagination function free
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1康德.判断力批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
  • 2德勒兹.康德与柏格森解读[M].张宇凌、关群德译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.5.76-77.
  • 3Steven M.Cahn,Philosophy for the twenty-first century a comprehensive reader[R].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2003.823.
  • 4康德.纯粹理性批判批判[M].邓晓芒译.杨祖陶校,人民出版社,2004.63.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部