期刊文献+

SLIPA喉罩用于纤维支气管镜检查的肺通气效果观察 被引量:1

Observation of lung ventilation effects in bronchoscopy with streamlined liner pharynx airway
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用自身对照设计方法比较咽通气道衬垫(streamlined liner of the pharynx airway,SLIPA)喉罩在置入纤维支气管镜前后机械通气的有效性。方法选择25例美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)体格状况分级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级,拟在全身麻醉下行下肢内固定取出术的患者,在常规诱导后插入SLIPA喉罩。检查无漏气,位置满意后,通过Y型接头接呼吸机,将潮气量设为10 ml/kg,实施容量控制强制通气模式(CMV)。记录此后连续5次呼吸的平均吸气流速、呼气流速、吸气峰压、吸气气道阻力及气道的顺应性。再经Y型接头的吸痰口、以SLIPA喉罩为引导置入纤维支气管镜至气管隆突上方约1 cm处,再次记录此后连续5次呼吸的平均吸气流速、呼气流速、吸气峰压、吸气气道阻力及气道的顺应性。结果所有患者在置入纤维支气管镜前后均能获得良好的通气效果,平均吸气流速、呼气流速、吸气峰压、吸气气道阻力及气道的顺应性均无显著差异。结论 SLIPA喉罩可以为纤维支气管镜检查提供有效、安全、长时间的通气支持。 Objective To compare the effect of the Streamlined liner pharynx airway(SLIPA) pre-and post-ventilation with a randomized auto control design.Methods Twenty five patients with ASAⅠorⅡ,scheduled for internal fixation dislodgment surgery in lower limb under general anesthesia.After the routine intravenous anesthesia induction,the SLIPA were inserted.To connect respirator by a Y-shaped joint after checking the airway seal and location is satisfactory.The mean inspired flow,expired flow,peak inspiratory pressure,airway resistance and airway compliance of five continuous breaths were measured after CMV+ ventilation strategy with 10 ml/kg tidal volume were enforced.Then bronchoscopy were inserted and situated 1cm above the tracheal carina with SLIPA for the guide by the Y-shaped joint.The mean expired flow,inspired flow,peak inspiratory pressure the mean airway resistance and airway compliance of five continuous breaths were measured again.Results Adequate ventilation were obtained in all patients pre-and post-insertion of SLIPA.The mean expired flow,inspired flow,peak inspiratory pressure,airway resistance and airway compliance did not show significant difference.Conclusion SLIPA is safe and effective ventilation that can be used in bronchoscopy for long time.
机构地区 解放军
出处 《东南国防医药》 2010年第6期503-505,共3页 Military Medical Journal of Southeast China
关键词 SLIPA 喉罩 纤支镜 肺通气 SLIPA larygeal mask ronchoscopy lung ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1缪冬梅,周易.无痛纤支镜检查术中几种供氧方法及比较[J].现代医药卫生,2005,21(2):137-138. 被引量:6
  • 2Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal^TM and SLIPA^TM airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth, 2006, 53:188-193.
  • 3Cook TM, Gupta K, Gabbott DA, et al. An evaluation of the airway management device. Anaesth, 2001, 56 : 660-664.
  • 4Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58 : 136-142.
  • 5Cindy Hein, Harry Owenand John. Plummer Randomized comparison of the SLIPA ( Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway) and the SS-LM (Soft Seal Laryngeal Mask ) by medicalstudents. Emer Med Austr, 2006, 18 : 478-483.
  • 6Markus Lange, Thorsten Smul, Peter Zimmermann, et al. The effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPA) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask airway in ophthalmic surgery. Anesth Anal , 2007, 104:431-434.
  • 7Brimaeombe J, Clarke G, Keller C. Lingual nerve injury associated with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a ease report and review of the literature. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 95 : 420-423.
  • 8Bruce IA, Ellis R, Kay NJ. Nerve injury and the laryngeal mask airway. J Laryngol Otol, 2004, 118: 899-901.
  • 9Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93 : 104-109.
  • 10Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology, 2002, 96 : 289-295.

共引文献19

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部