摘要
目的研究H5N1病毒对A549细胞和Hep-2细胞的黏附和进入特性。方法用凝集素染色技术和流式细胞术检测A549细胞和Hep-2细胞表面SAα2,3Gal和SAα2,6Gal的表达;用间接免疫荧光法检测H5N1病毒进入细胞情况;用Western blot法分析病毒进入A549细胞和Hep-2细胞的效率。结果 A549细胞和Hep-2细胞表面有大量SAα2,3Gal,但SAα2,6Gal含量却很少。Hep-2细胞表面SAα2,3Gal受体的表达水平高于A549细胞。H5N1病毒能够进入A549细胞和Hep-2细胞,而且H5N1病毒对A549细胞的亲嗜性更强。与A549细胞相比,Hep-2细胞对H5N1病毒诱导的细胞死亡更敏感。结论细胞表面唾液酸-α2,3-半乳糖的表达与H5N1病毒的黏附一致。然而,唾液酸受体可能不是介导病毒进入的唯一因素。
Objective To study the attachment and subsequent entry of H5N1 virus into A549 cells and Hep-2 cells.Methods Expression of SAα2,3Gal and SAα2,6Gal on A549 cells and Hep-2 cells was examined by lectin fluorescence and flow cytometry.H5N1 virus in A549 and Hep-2 cells were measured by indirect immunofluorescence assay.The entry efficiency was determined by Western blot analysis.Results SAα2,3Gal was prevalent in A549 cells and Hep-2 cells,while SAα2,6 Gal was little found.Furthermore,SAα2,3Gal expression was more regularly observed in Hep-2 cells rather than A549 cells.The H5N1 virus tested could enter A549 cells and Hep-2 cells.However,viral entry efficiency was different between the two cell lines.A549 cells were found to be more susceptible to avian influenza than Hep-2 cells.H5N1-induced cell death was inefficient in A549 cells than Hep-2 cells.Conclusion The expression of SAα2,3Gal on the cells tested corresponded with the attachment of the H5N1 virus.However,sialic acid only may not be sufficient for entry into cells.
出处
《基础医学与临床》
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第12期1318-1324,共7页
Basic and Clinical Medicine