期刊文献+

医疗纠纷举证责任的法理探讨

Legal Research of the Burden of Proof in Medical Disputes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法院所确定的事实皆系过去的历史事实,为确保裁判的客观性及公正性,事实的确定即非单纯法院主观的认识,须依"证据法则"作合理客观的确定。而当事人主张的事实有争执,在诉讼中即为所称的待证事实或证据的对象。当事人主张有利于己的事实,即有提出证据证明其事实真实性的责任,亦称为举证责任,当事人不能尽举证责任或所举证据不能证明所主张的事实为真正时,即须负有受到败诉判决的危险,此亦即诉讼上"举证之所在,败诉之所在"的真谛。医疗纠纷本身的专业性和复杂性使得举证责任具备了独特的品格。 The facts determined by the court are just the historical facts of the past.In order to ensure the objectivity and the fairness of judgment,the determination of facts is not purely a subjective understanding by the court,which instead has to make reasonable determination based on the "rules of evidence".When the facts presented by the party concerned are controversial,they are called the facts to be testified or the targets of evidence in a lawsuit.And when the party concerned presents the facts which are advantageous to him/her,he/she is obliged to produce evidence to prove the authenticity of those facts.This is also called the burden of proof.When the party concerned cannot fulfill the burden of proof or the evidence produced cannot prove the authenticity of the facts presented,he/she has to bear the risk of being defeated in a court decision.This is implying to the true essence of the saying,"Where the proof is,why the defeat is".And the burden of proof has been rendered of the distinctive character by medical disputes intrinsic professional and complexity.
作者 冯杰
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期47-49,共3页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 医疗纠纷 举证责任 举证责任分配 medical disputes burden of proof distribution of the burden of proof
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献34

  • 1朱姝,张少峰.论商誉权的法律保护[J].现代法学,1996,18(1):65-66. 被引量:10
  • 2宋锡祥.海峡两岸司法协助新探[J].政治与法律,2006(2):87-92. 被引量:14
  • 3鲁珊珊.内地与香港民商事判决承认与执行的现状与建议[J].理论观察,2006(3):98-100. 被引量:2
  • 4殷仁胜.国际私法中法律规避的定性问题[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,28(6):98-101. 被引量:3
  • 5陈聪富.《美国医疗过失举证责任之研究》.朱柏松等.《医疗过失举证责任之比较》.元照出版公司,2008年版,第162页.
  • 6陈忠五.《法国法上医疗过错的举证责任》.朱柏松等.《医疗过失举证责任之比较》.元照出版公司,2008年版,第126页以下.
  • 7詹森林.《德国医疗过失举证责任之研究》.朱柏松等.《医疗过失举证责任之研究》.元照出版公司,2008年版,第69页.
  • 8张新宝.《大陆医疗损害赔偿案件的过失认定》,载朱柏松等.《医疗过失举证责任之比较》,台北元照出版公司,2008年版,第79页.
  • 9程合红.商事人格权论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002.75,86.
  • 10朱柏松.《论日本医疗过失之举证责任》,朱柏松等.《医疗过失举证责任之比较》,台湾元照出版公司2008年版,第23页.

共引文献197

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部