期刊文献+

自由、合作、政府引导:三类职业教育与培训模式的国际比较 被引量:5

International Comparison and Implications of Liberal,Coordinated and Government-led Vocational Eduction and Training System
原文传递
导出
摘要 西方国家将职业教育与培训分为自由主义、合作主义及政府引导型三类模式,其依据主要是职业教育和培训与教育体系、劳动力市场及政府和社会力量参与关联性。本文选取美国、德国和瑞典、韩国作为三类模式的典型代表进行国际比较,以期为我国职业教育与培训的发展提供有价值的启示与借鉴。 Liberal,coordinated and government-led vocational eduction and training(VET) system is one of important model classifications,to which western scholars have done a large number of studies.In this classification,the relationship between VET and educational system,VET and labour market,the role of government and social partners in VET have been studied in a view of international comparison.This paper selects the United States,Germany and Sweden,South Korea,as a typical representative of three models,so as to provide knowledge and reference for our country.
作者 米红 韩娟
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第23期69-74,共6页 Research in Educational Development
基金 国家自然科学重点资助项目"城乡劳动力市场整合机理与实现机制研究"(70933001)的资助
关键词 职业教育与培训 国际比较 vocational eduction and training system international comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Proceedings of the First International Conference.Towards a History of Vocational Education and Training (VET) in Europe in a Comparative Perspective[M].Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004. 1.
  • 2L. M. Lynch .Training and the Private Sector. International Comparisons[M].Chicago, University of Chicago Press,1994.1-24.
  • 3Crouch, C., D. Finegold and M. Sako.Are Skills the Answer? The Political Economy of Skill Creation in Advanced Industrial Countries [M].New York, Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 4Tomas Korpi and Antje Mertens,Training Systems and Labor Mobility: A Comparison between Germany and Sweden[J].The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2003,(4).
  • 5Iversen, T. and J. D. Stephens.Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation[J].Comparative Political Studies, 2008, (6).
  • 6Estevez-Abe,M. ,T.Iversen and B. Soskice,.Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State'[A]. P. A. Hall and D. Soskice.Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage [C].New York: Oxford University Press,2001. 145-183.
  • 7Hall,P.andD. Soskice.Varieties of Capitalism.The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage [M].New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 8Gerhard Bosch and Jean Charest.Vocational Training and the Labour Market in Liberal and Coordinated Economies[J]. Industrial Relations Journal, 2008.
  • 9Ashton, D. and F. Green, Education.Training and the Global Economy[M].Chehenham: Edward Elgar,1996,.
  • 10Thelen, K., How Institutions Evolve. The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan[M]. Cambridge: Calnbridge University Press, 2004.

二级参考文献2

共引文献4

同被引文献48

  • 1郑秉文.社会权利:现代福利国家模式的起源与诠释[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2):1-11. 被引量:57
  • 2陈宇.职业教育是我国教育中光芒四射的亮点[J].职业技术教育,2006,27(30):48-50. 被引量:3
  • 3艾德里安.齐得曼,沈华.政府在职业培训投资中的作用[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(3):42-46. 被引量:9
  • 4[美]迈克尔·P·托达罗.经济发展(第六版)[M].黄卫平,等,译.北京:中国经济出版社,1999.
  • 5[美]迈克尔·谢若登.资产与穷人.--项新的美国福利政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 6国家统计局人口和就业司.中国劳动统计年鉴(2007)[Z].北京:中国统计出版社.2007.
  • 7长劳社发[2008]25号:关于公布城乡劳动力职业技能免费培训首批工种培训、鉴定财政补贴标准的通知[Z].2008.
  • 8[美]迈克尔·P·托迭罗.经济发展[M].北京:中国经济出版社.1999.
  • 9关信平.转变经济发展方式下的社会政策议题[A].中国社会学社会政策专业委员会.转型中的社会政策创新论文集[C].2010.
  • 10[美]詹克斯·赫克曼.北京大学演讲《中国人力资本》[EB/OL].http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20031204/18575479-08.shtml,2003-12-04.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部